Tesoro Del Alma News...
Sunday, January 29, 2012
Saturday, January 28, 2012
Spy or Terrorist
Spy or Terrorist
Terrorist Or Spy
Phantom Bank Paper Fraudster, Terrorist Or Spy Or Latchford’s puppet?
This story includes NOC Spy “Lord” Neil Gibson The Famous Philipino Phanthom was just a runner and not the mastermind – a can of worms is about to be exposed.
by, Unwanted Publicity Intelligence, the website(s), Host [ UnwantedPublicity@Gmail.com ]
July 21, 2010 16:30:08 p.m. ( PST ) [ Updated ] – [ Originally Published: July 14, 2010 17:22:01 ( PST ) ]
USA, California, Tustin – July 14, 2010 – Operating under unusual southern California shadows, actually some rather nice upscale residential townhomes adjacent Orange County’s former U.S. Marine Corps Helicopter Station, secret teams and squads of U.S. government federal agents task undercover assignments brought from other federal agencies.
One case, few ( if any ) federal agents wish to discuss, sees secret efforts naming the U.S. Federal Reserve ( FED ), U.S. Department of Homeland Security ( DHS ), Immigration Customs Enforcement, U.S. Central Intelligence Agency ( CIA ) along with a small group of operatives ( men and women ) combating international bank paper fraud worldwide, but strangely not so much the counterfeit manufacturing and / or distribution.
“During tough economic times we’re seeing more and more legitimate international businessmen involving themselves in trade financing deals not likely to have been consumated a few years ago,” said one agent who asked not to be identified.
The government enjoys public opinion that it somehow sees all and knows all in order to protect and provide a service so, ascertaining what a U.S. federal law enforcement agent is specifically interested in ( specific information ) is difficult for most interviewers to discover, but there was no pretentious air about this federal agent who at ease described in-general what his team encounters.
“When there’s a more than likely chance big money is going to be exchanged, we’re going to try and prevent that, but getting to the bottom of the problem is not easy. We’re not interested in wasting budget resources chasing around the world after foreign nationals, rogues or phantoms whom for the most part are behind international bank paper document artwork ( ‘counterfeiting’ ) or passing it around ( ‘distribution’ ) to see if any of it sticks and makes them some money in return.”
“You know, things weren’t always this difficult. We’d set up a deal, they’d drop by and we’d wrap things up. Today, some crooks are no longer as disheveled as some mug shots ( booking photos ) appear to most, and so technical issues are handled by young professionals loaded with energy, professional researchers supply master fraudsters with loads of useful information and between the two there isn’t anything that can’t be done so, we’ve got our work cut-out for us.”
The agent continued, “Transaction handlers ( brokers ) or export managers typically inform us who they ‘think’ they’ve been working with, however the real nuts and bolts behind these global criminal organizations ( ringleaders / kingpins ) are now using so many multiple aliases and so frequently that it’s becoming difficult to keep track of who is really running what, where.”
When asked about something real interesting in a case he replied, “Well, at the top of our list is one we nicknamed ‘Philippines Phantom’ whose involved in an awful lot of international bank paper fraud schemes and he uses many aliases. We believe the Philippines Phantom has a close following of other nefarious characters using ‘his’ former aliases. At first we thought it was just other international bank paper crooks, further down the foodchain, just paying hommage to a bolder more famous crook, but then we realized the other crooks were simply too lazy and using the ‘Philippines Phantom’ alias gave them less work to do in pulling off an international bank paper fraud deal of their own.”
Who is the ‘Philippines Phantom’? When asked, no hints were given. The agent coughed and said, “That investigation is still ongoing so, no information at this time can be publicly released.”
Although no official information was released as to who the ‘Philippines Phantom’ really is, the agent suddenly asked if my laptop was online, it was and so the agent curiously visited a couple ( 2 ) foreign country websites. At each, he would go to a particular webpage, stand up from the chair and ask me if he could walk around the room and study the wallpaper. Now, I took that to indirectly indicate the agent wouldn’t be studying the webpages he was visiting ( in-private, the laptop was turned away from me ) so, I decidely took that curious opportunity to look at each webpage – long enough to copy each pertinent URL address for later review. Those two ( 2 ) webpages, UNWANTED PUBLICITY INFORMATION GROUP database files ( 16,000,000,000 pages and still growing ) and some global intelligence contacts gave my research enough information to fill this report and more.
Bank Paper Trade Tricks
Where imposters might not work as perfectly as very knowledgeable international master bank paper fraudsters, it has become easier with technology today to continue defrauding by simply changing appearances.
Fraud tricks, such as very short hair cuts ( or bald ), moustache or beard ( trimmed, cut off or added ), hair wigs ( different colors or styles ), weight loss or gain ( stuffed undergarments ), contact lens eyewear ( change eye colors ), identity papers ( different identity cards, passports, etc. ) are sometimes still used.
Smart fraud money is found where master bank paper fraudsters send-in entirely ‘new faces’ as their new ‘representatives’ whom may and are likelier now than ever before to be nothing more than unsuspecting freelance commissioned promoters acting unsuspectingly as the ‘middle-man’ or ‘broker’ for the master bank paper fraudsters whom are now disguising themselves to new unsuspecting “representatives” whom sometimes even come with respectable backgrounds. During tough economic times, a host of professionals are looking for work outside their usual occupations, and international bank paper fraudsters knowing this see tough economic times as their playground to further their own frauds and bottomline.
Modifying fraud techniques using computer enhancements can further bank paper frauds by the fraudster going one step further in obtaining and implimenting ‘security paper’ enhancing quality in the manufacturing of counterfeit bank paper and support documents for seemingly increased authenticity. Furthering fraudulent international bank paper schemes aimed at unsuspecting victims can be taken by modified avenues of fraudulent approach again and again.
Altering or completely changing a ‘fraudulent storyline’ can lead to quickly resurrecting an old fraud into something that appears entirely different, and with few knowing anything about ‘fraud transformation details’, later in the scheme another fraudulent international bank paper ( different name of an institution ) may eventually be introduced providing an unrecognizeable twist aimed at victims of fraud.
New Spy versus Spy Game – Political Opposition Leftists Confused By Right Wing Terrorist Extremists
The Philippines Phantom use of alaises, said to have been later reused by yet another host of other nefarious individuals, indicates ‘organized crime’ sophistication exercising indirect criminal subterfuge, tradecrafts used more likely by an international spy or international criminal mastermind, but in either event requires a special set of skills, excellent training and / or years of practice.
This particular case appears to have become operationalized not by a rogue spy but perhaps by a terrorist akin to the clever but infamous Carlos Illyich Ramirez-Sanchez (aka) Carlos The Jackal believed skilled in intelligence tradecrafts and used by the legacy Soviet Union KGB. More has definitely been seen out of the Philippines Phantom than most run of the mill international bank paper fraudsters and identity thieves. To remain aloof for so many decades without being caught by law enforcement whom are supposedly chasing international Asian terrorists speaks volumes as to the liklihood of another driving force that has ‘been allowing’ the Philippines Phantom to mysteriously escape punishment as was seen in 2001 ( further below ).
Naive to what non-official cover ( NOC ) government foreign intelligence agents are, according to a U.S. government federal agent working from out-of one of those fancy southern California condominium undercover teams assigned by other federal agencies, in late 2008 a non-official cover ( NOC ) government foreign intelligence agent [ Neil Benjamin Gibson ] was believed to be, amongst all the other low down dirty rotten scoundrels, an international bank paper trading fraudster, but instead was a NOC feigning to be a ‘trader’ brokering what actually turned out to be a sting operation using what appeared to be members of the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank supposedly operating a ‘secret reward recovery program’ designed by U.S. federal law enforcement agents to ensnare as many loads of the mysterious legacy “Series 1934″ U.S. Federal Reserve Notes ( FRN ) / U.S. Federal Reserve Bonds ( FRB ) and / or Federal Reserve System bearer bond coupon certificates stashed en masse throughout the Philippines and other parts of Asia.
During October 2008, in California for his meeeting with NOC agent Neil Gibson at the Los Angeles International Airport, the Filipino man arrived from the Philippines to just drop off a few samples and – he ‘thought’ – collect his U.S. Federal Reserve Bank reward. Instead, the Filipino was told a lie by Neil B. Gibson that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security ( DHS ) had to clear his reward money through channels but that the Filipino man would get his reward.
Although the Filipino man, who never gave up was nicknamed “cowboy,” he was not deported and did not receive his so-called “reward” money as Neil Gibson described, but instead was flown back to the Philippines to secure more Series 1934 U.S. Federal Reserve Notes ( FRN ) from his contact for the U.S. government. Cowboy, was a southern California traveling businessman, an international “trader,” who commuted frequently to the Philippines, France, Ukraine, and around the rest of the world as required.
Some old timers believe it got so hot during the Cold War that nations were tripping over their own spies. Today perhaps, nothing’s changed except that valuable spies are not used out front in so many exchange deals as before but instead saw non-official cover ( NOC ) government foreign intelligence agents handle the brunt of that work because they are so much cheaper to maintain and easier to plausibly deny the existence of should secret government foreign operations go awry – as often times they do.
The Philippines Phantom would not have be easy to locate background information on had it not been for the ability to review, for the purposes of this report, private intelligence dossiers, database files and other international information supplied by affiliates of the UNWANTED PUBLICITY INFORMATION GROUP.
We were initially pointed to a problem perceived coming from somewhere inside a Philippines organization known as the PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION ON GOOD GOVERNMENT ( PCGG ). Was something amiss with PCGG corporate governance? Did something unsavory surrounded PCGG chairman Camilo L. Sabio or one of her staff?
We found PCGG representative Gerry Ledonio [ TEL: (718) 358-8114 end_of_the_skype_highlighting ] being “handled” by the law firm O’BUCKLEY ( New York, USA ) that was arranging secret PCGG meetings with the southern California Filipino man nicknamed “Cowboy” who was also very much an international bank paper trader who held a plethora of fraudulent international bank paper financial instruments [ i.e. bank guarantees ( BG ), certificates of deposit ( CD ), stand-by letters of credit ( SBLC ), safe-keeping receipts ( SKR ), etc. ] accompanied by a whole host of support documents, amongst many others, where the now-late former Philippines President Ferdinand Edralin Marcos (aka) Ferdinand E. Marcos was seen named within a Letter Of Instruction naming his sidekick to be “William V. Morales,” an alias used by “Wilfredo S. Saurin” (aka) the “Philippines Phantom.”
Reference
http://upintelligence.multiply.com/photos/album/15#photo=136
Early background on Wilfredo S. Saurin found him supporting Asian terrorists and another international bank paper fraudster, Alexander Mann. Together, Saurin and Mann teamed up with Orange County, California businessman nicknamed “Tony Nguyen,” ( an alias he uses ) chairman of the GOVERNMENT OF FREE VIET NAM ( GFVN ) in Garden Grove, California where it was arranged to manufacture, distribute and sell fraudulent paper currency printed to support terrorist agendas of “Asian government” we found was actually not a real government at all but an organization that called itself the GOVERNMENT OF FREE VIET NAM ( GFVN ), a fraud money political front for an Asian terrorist splinter group garnering support from aligned nations with U.S. covert funding coup based assassinations and other destabilization efforts to overthrow the Republic Of Viet Nam, and headquartered right across the border in Cambodia we found Philippines Phantom Wilfredo Saurin leading the CHEA DAM GROUP OF COMPANIES ( Phnom Penh, Cambodia ), ASIA REAL PROPERTY CO. LTD. ( Phnom Penh, Cambodia ), ARP-OITC GROUP CO. LTD. ( Phnom Penh, Cambodia ) and THE OFFICE OF INTERNATIONAL TREASURY CONTROL ( Washington, D.C., USA ) formerly led by Ray Chhat Dam (aka) Diem C. Ray ( Cambodia ) and Keith Francis Scott ( Australia ).
We learned some of the nuances of the Philippines Phantom who was apparently skilled in martial arts but more importantly tradecrafts of spying as a foreign agent adept at the arts of infiltration and creating insurrections because he led a tight knit group of international criminal minded Asian terrorists directed to utilize a legacy U.S. Central Intelligence Agency ( CIA ) Viet Nam war time era counterfeiting operation that manufactured a cross-border ( viet Nam / Cambodia ) air lift infiltration air drop of billions in counterfeit money ( i.e. currency known as “dongs” – North Viet Nam government dollar ) that was used to make GOVERNMENT OF FREE VIET NAM ( GFVN ) currency ( sold to Vietnamese in Orange County, California, USA ) and used to design, print, distribute, and sell various forms of fraudulent but official looking paper monetary currencies, international bank paper and related support documents, identities and more used in blackmarket sales for up-front advance fee schemes as one of many fraudulent collection practices used behind the scenes to secretly fund international terrorist actions aimed primarily against specifically targeted assets ( holdings ) of the Republic of Viet Nam and its government administration from a revolutionary group known as the FREE VIETNAM REVOLUTIONARY GROUP ( FVRG ) tied to its political action arm GOVERNMENT OF FREE VIET NAM ( GFVN ) organization ( Garden Grove, California, USA ).
Although the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank ( New York, NY, USA ) cannot nor is it able to keep up with all the Philippines Phantom alias names and schemes, it does realize the Philippines Phanton has not been stopped because he continues spreading fraudulent international bank paper today. But what else can he do?
Research notes ( in reverse chronological order – below ) may shock readers whom will be provided with basic insights into where these particular Asian terrorist group extremists were harvesting others to advance their cause. An inside look at hardline politically driven criminal masterminds presenting outlandish schemes, using other people as their representatives to do their dirty work and get arrested for it, and a cornucopia of creative deceit techniques bordering on psychological treachery for victims so much so and to the extent that international bank paper fraud may disappear, but for a brief moment, when one realizes more serious crimes linked to it. Some may not understand that the Philippines Phanton is much more than just an international bank paper fraudster, terrorist or spy.
The initial list of Philippines Phantom alias names grew as additional nefarious characters – believed to be his comrades – began using his alias names plus other alias names too so, the most current list of Philippines Phantom alias names, are ( immediately below ):
Wilfredo Sarabia Saurin (also known as)
Wilfred Saurin (aka)
Datu G.L. (aka)
Wilfredo S. Ramos (aka)
William Morales (aka)
William V. Morales (aka)
Joseph E.S. Daraman Jr. (aka)
Joseph Eutiquio Severino Daraman Jr. (aka)
Joseph Daraman (aka)
Joseph Teo Hui Kiat (aka)
Johannes Riyad (aka)
Yohannes Riyadi (aka)
Saroeun Soush (aka)
Wilfredo Serion (aka)
Dr. Saroeun (aka)
Soush Saroeun
Keeping track of the alias name list ( above ) for the Philippines Phantom provided leads to research legacy information, most of which disappeared long ago, but that information along with more from the Unwanted Publicity Information Group made this report possible along with the information now available ( immediately below ) in chronological order:
- – - -
[ In RE: ( alias ) William Morales ( immediately below ) ]
Courtesy: Unwanted Publicity Information Group
BANGKOK POST ( Bangkok, Thailand )
Fifth ( 5th ) Arrest In Bond Scam, Gang On The Run - Payab Explains His Role In Police Sting
by, Anucha Charoenpo and Wassayos Ngarmkham
April 21, 2001
THAILAND, Bangkok – A fifth ( 5th ) person [ William Morales ] has been arrested and charged with the multi-billion dollar U.S. bond fraud while other gang members are believed on the run but still in Thailand. A special law enforcement task force was formed to capture them.
William Morales, a Filipino, was taken into custody on Thursday night at the Town In Town Hotel located on Rama IX Road ( Bangkok, Thailand ).
Four ( 4 ) others were arrested earlier on Thursday:
Jacqueline Enriquez ( 29 ) – PHILIPPINES;
Robert Ng ( 43 ) – PHILIPPINES;
Tan Ho Chee ( 40 ) – SINGAPORE; and,
Chai-aree Santiwongchai ( son of a local Chinese language newspaper tycoon ).
They were charged with fraud and falsification after allegedly trying to sell fake United States bonds – dated 1934 – with a face value of $24,700,000,000 ( USD ) billion.
Chai-aree Santiwongchai was additionally charged after a lawyer for a leasing company complained he had issued a bad check for 4,500,000 million baht to his client.
The counterfeit bonds were brought into the country 7-months ago and put in a deposit box at DEUTSCHE BANK ( Bangkok, Thailand ) in the name of Mr. Chai-aree SantiWongChai.
Payab Shinawatra, brother of the Thailand Prime Minister, said yesterday he had been asked by a friend who believed the bonds were authentic to seek his brother’s help to redeem them in the United States. ‘The friend who approached him’ was ‘not among the five ( 5 ) arrested suspects’, and had ‘helped arrange’ for ‘him to meet’ the people who had the bonds.
Mr. Payab Shinawatra said he informed the Prime Minister he had been approached, and later contacted crime suppression police, who began an investigation.
The sellers had changed their mind on seeing him, prompting him to inform the police.
Police searched the house of Chai-aree Santiwongchai in Lat Phrao soi 1 for a second ( 2nd ) time Thursday night and said they found more bonds, believed to be counterfeit, pictures and related documents stuffed in a steel box bearing the U.S. seal.
Deputy National Police Chief Pol Gen Sant Sarutanont said task force members would be sent to Provinces where the remaining gang members are believed to be still in hiding.
About 3-years ago some foreigners arrived in Thailand using Thai citizens as intermediaries to attempt selling ( to gullible people ) fake U.S. bonds by claiming they ‘legally inherited’ them. Prospective victims were shown a document purporting to be a Court Order confirming that the sellers could execute sale of those U.S. bonds.
Deputy National Police Chief Pol Gen Sant Sarutanont said, “On April 10, 2001 the gang tried to sell 70 bonds – each valued at $10,000,000 ( USD ) million – to a Thailand customer who sent him pictures of the bonds. The U.S. American Embassy ( Bangkok, Thailand ) declared them fakes.
Police are still investigating whether the gang had anything to do with the U.S. bonds Senator Chaowarin Latthasaksiri claimed to have recovered from Lijia cave in Kanchanaburi. Senator Chaowarin Latthasaksiri said they were part of a treasure left by Japan troops during World War II.
- – - -
[ In RE: ( alias ) William Morales ( immediately below ) ]
Courtesy: Unwanted Publicity Information Group
Source: BANGKOK POST ( Bangkok, Thailand )
Police Quandary Over Charges
Bonds Not Issued, So Fakes Not Counterfeit
by, Wassayos Ngarmkham April 21, 2001
THAILAND, Bangkok – The investigation into the counterfeit U.S. bonds case took a bizarre twist yesterday when investigators conceded they might not be able to take legal action against any of the five suspects they have arrested.
Bangkok police Crime Suppression Division ( CSD ) sources said the five ( 5 ), who have been under police detention since late last month, have been charged with forgery and fraud.
The sources said a ‘legal technicality prevents police from proceeding with the case’.
Investigators were unable to define the bonds, carrying the face value of $24,700,000,000 ( USD ) billion, as a counterfeit product. U.S. officials who were questioned as witnesses had told the CSD the U.S. government ‘had never printed bonds of that type’, which by legal interpretation, meant the documents ‘could not be considered forged’. “This means that we cannot charge them with forgery because they did not do anything which is considered an offence,” one of the sources said. He said the investigators had also charged the five ( 5 ) suspects with public fraud, but this could not proceed either since ‘no damaged party had lodged a complaint against the suspects’. “There are concerns among the officers involved that they could be sued by the five ( 5 ) suspects if they cannot find legal justifications for the arrest.”
William Morales, Jacqueline Enriquez ( 29 ) and Robert Ng ( 43 ) of the Philippines, and Tan Ho Chee ( 40 ) of Singapore and Chai-aree Santiwongchai ( son of a local Chinese-language newspaper tycoon ) were arrested late last month in a sting operation after it was alleged they possessed fake U.S. bonds.
The arrests came in the wake of a claim by Ratchaburi senator Chaowarin Latthasaksiri that a fortune in U.S. bonds was among treasure left inside a cave in Kanchanaburi province by Japan troops after World War II. It later turned out to be a hoax.
The five ( 5 ) suspects are being detained at the Bangkok Special Prison pending the outcome of the investigation.
The CSD will need the public prosecution endorsement if the five ( 5 ) are to be tried in court.
- – - -
[ In RE: FREE VIETNAM REVOLUTIONARY GROUP ( FVRG ), GOVERNMENT OF FREE VIET NAM ( GFVN ), Tony Nguyen, Ray Dam, et al. ( immediately below ) ]
Courtesy: Unwanted Publicity Information Group
Source: KYODO NEWS INTERNATIONAL ( Japan )
Asian Economic News
Japanese, Vietnamese Alleged Terrorists Charged
September 3, 2001
PHILIPPINES, Manila – Philippine immigration and police authorities filed criminal charges Monday against a Japanese man and two ( 2 ) Vietnamese men in connection with an alleged plan to bomb the Viet Nam Embassy in Manila.
Makoto Ito and the two ( 2 ) Vietnamese men – Vo Van Duc (aka) Nguyen Vinh Tan ( 41 ), a Vietnamese U.S. citizen, and Huyn Thuan Ngoc ( 42 ), a Vietnamese Switzerland citizen – were charged with violating immigration laws and illegal possession of explosives.
Immigration Commissioner Andrea Domingo told reporters that aside from overstaying in the Philippines, the three ( 3 ) alleged terrorists were also charged for the non-bailable offense of trying to overthrow an established government ( Viet Nam ).
Another suspect, Florinda Estrada-Valderama, a Filipina who allegedly owns the townhouse in San Juan, Manila Metro where the three ( 3 ) suspects were arrested Thursday, has been summoned for police questioning.
Officials indicate that the two ( 2 ) Vietnamese suspects are members of the GOVERNMENT OF FREE VIET NAM ( GFVN ), the political action arm of the militarized underground FREE VIETNAM REVOLUTIONARY GROUP ( FVRG ), that aims to free Viet Nam from communist rule military action .
Japanese suspect Makoto Ito ( 62 ) declared his innocence telling Japan media he, was a retired hotel employee seeking financial ventures in Manila, had met the two ( 2 ) other Vietnamese suspects through another acquaintance – Vietnamese U.S. citizen “Tony” – and was sharing an accommodation with them to save on rent.
[ UPI NOTE: The organization GOVERNMENT OF FREE VIET NAM ( USA ) chairman, Nguyen Huu Chanh, was already in hiding during the time period of these arrests in the Philippines, however he arranged for the aforementioned man "Tony" (aka) Tony Nguyen to become Acting Chairman of the GOVERNMENT OF FREE VIET NAM ( GFVN ) in Garden Grove, California, USA. ]
Makoto Ito said that just like him, his acquaintance [ Tony Nguyen ] was seeking financial opportunities in the Philippines, and that he [ Tony Nguyen ] even showed him [ Makoto Ito ] a photo – of himself [ Tony Nguyen ] standing with former United States of America President William J. Clinton – amongst other photos presented during the press conference.
Makoto Ito – whom immigration and police surveillance showed was with the two ( 2 ) Vietnamese in three ( 3 ) houses they occupied in Metro Manila – is believed to be a financier of the group. Ito said he had been doing a survey for a subway project and researching on possible investment opportunities in a gyro-plane assembly plant when he was arrested along with the other two ( 2 ) suspects. “I’m a former hotel employee. I’m not a terrorist. It’s a mistaken arrest,” Ito told Japan reporters in an interview.
Earlier Monday, Makoto Ito wept and cowered from cameras when he and the two ( 2 ) Vietnamese men were presented before a press conference at Philippine National Police headquarters. Bomb materials, computers, books, and photos seized from the three ( 3 ) houses occupied by the suspects were also put on display to the media.
The GOVERNMENT OF FREE VIET NAM ( USA ) leader, Nguyen Huu Chanh, is believed to be in hiding and the subject of a manhunt in the Philippines.
In a FAX statement obtained by police, Nguyen H. Chanh admitted the Philippines arrested two ( 2 ) Vietnamese members of the GOVERNMENT OF FREE VIET NAM ( GFVN ) but said the GOVERNMENT OF FREE VIET NAM ( GFVN ) is not a terrorist organization and has no affiliation with the FREE VIETNAM REVOLUTIONARY GROUP ( FVRG ). The statement further read that the GOVERNMENT OF FREE VIET NAM ( GFVN ) is a worldwide organization engaged in liberating Vietnam from communist rule “by any possible means which are NOT against humanity,” and went on to say, “GFVN is NOT a terrorist organization. We have never been intended, and never will, [ edited-out by Philippines newspaper ] carry out any terrorist acts,” adding that the alleged explosive devices – seized from houses occupied by the three ( 3 ) suspects – “are our technical material which have been used solely in research for possible upcoming operations in Viet Nam.”
The Viet Nam Embassy said that Vietnamese U.S. citizen Vo Van Duc (aka) Nguyen Vinh Tan is also wanted in connection with the Vietnam Embassy bomb scare on June 19, 2001 in Bangkok, Thailand.
Nguyen Huu Chanh, leader of the GOVERNMENT OF FREE VIET NAM ( California, USA ), said the Vietnamese U.S. citizen Vo Van Duc (aka) Nguyen Vinh Tan was continuously residing uninterupted in the Philippines since February 21, 2001 and therefore cannot be the same man Bangkok, Thailand police associate with the later Viet Nam Embassy bomb scare on June 19, 2001.
Reference
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0WDP/is_2001_Sept_10/ai_79021264
- – - -
[ In RE: GOVERNMENT OF FREE VIET NAM ( GFVN ), GFVN Gold Bullion Reserve Certificates, Tony Nguyen, Ray Dam, et al. ( immediately below ) ]
Courtesy: Unwanted Publicity Information Group
Source: THE DILIGIZER BOARD
Subject: Ray C. Dam
Posted By: dinque2121 – Registered User
Posted At: January 12, 2003 / 2:36 a.m.
Whisper, he does travel occasionally. I met him some years ago in Bangkok. At the time he had some of the “Infamous” Soekarno and Marcos GB Certificates.
At the time he was actively involved with Tony Nyugen ( General Secretary of the Government of Free Viet Nam ) and Fred Kirkpatrick, a so-called 5 star General and former Senator from Illinois ( more lies ).
Their stated objectives was to use the Certificates to raise funds for the Government of Free Viet Nam. Tony Nyugen claimed he was going to be the next PM of Vietnam once they had freed Vietnam from Communism. Tony Nyugen’s organisation operates out of California and is still sctive.
Also involved was Gary Pierce – possibly “Pearce” – (aka) Gary Poindexter and Cheryl Poindexter of C.S.I. AG, a company that claimed to hold billions of gold reserves in Chile.
They issued Government of Free Vietnam Gold Bullion Reserve Certificates and sold many of them in the Far East. Of course, try to call on them at due date and what have you got, NOTHING. Even the officers have disappeared from the addresses given.
The whole group of these people also printed their own Government of Free Viet Nam currency ( money ) and was selling it to niave Vietnamese on the basis that when they come to power in Vietnam, the money would be full legal tender and they could then claim or use it.
All a very big SCAM with very devious people / parties behind it.
Ray Dam talks well and certainly has education, which is more than I can say for all the others, however WHAT A CROCK.
I just wasted a bit of time. I did not become involved…..fortunately.
Reference
Terrorist Or Spy
Phantom Bank Paper Fraudster, Terrorist Or Spy Or Latchford’s puppet?
This story includes NOC Spy “Lord” Neil Gibson The Famous Philipino Phanthom was just a runner and not the mastermind – a can of worms is about to be exposed.
by, Unwanted Publicity Intelligence, the website(s), Host [ UnwantedPublicity@Gmail.com ]
July 21, 2010 16:30:08 p.m. ( PST ) [ Updated ] – [ Originally Published: July 14, 2010 17:22:01 ( PST ) ]
USA, California, Tustin – July 14, 2010 – Operating under unusual southern California shadows, actually some rather nice upscale residential townhomes adjacent Orange County’s former U.S. Marine Corps Helicopter Station, secret teams and squads of U.S. government federal agents task undercover assignments brought from other federal agencies.
One case, few ( if any ) federal agents wish to discuss, sees secret efforts naming the U.S. Federal Reserve ( FED ), U.S. Department of Homeland Security ( DHS ), Immigration Customs Enforcement, U.S. Central Intelligence Agency ( CIA ) along with a small group of operatives ( men and women ) combating international bank paper fraud worldwide, but strangely not so much the counterfeit manufacturing and / or distribution.
“During tough economic times we’re seeing more and more legitimate international businessmen involving themselves in trade financing deals not likely to have been consumated a few years ago,” said one agent who asked not to be identified.
The government enjoys public opinion that it somehow sees all and knows all in order to protect and provide a service so, ascertaining what a U.S. federal law enforcement agent is specifically interested in ( specific information ) is difficult for most interviewers to discover, but there was no pretentious air about this federal agent who at ease described in-general what his team encounters.
“When there’s a more than likely chance big money is going to be exchanged, we’re going to try and prevent that, but getting to the bottom of the problem is not easy. We’re not interested in wasting budget resources chasing around the world after foreign nationals, rogues or phantoms whom for the most part are behind international bank paper document artwork ( ‘counterfeiting’ ) or passing it around ( ‘distribution’ ) to see if any of it sticks and makes them some money in return.”
“You know, things weren’t always this difficult. We’d set up a deal, they’d drop by and we’d wrap things up. Today, some crooks are no longer as disheveled as some mug shots ( booking photos ) appear to most, and so technical issues are handled by young professionals loaded with energy, professional researchers supply master fraudsters with loads of useful information and between the two there isn’t anything that can’t be done so, we’ve got our work cut-out for us.”
The agent continued, “Transaction handlers ( brokers ) or export managers typically inform us who they ‘think’ they’ve been working with, however the real nuts and bolts behind these global criminal organizations ( ringleaders / kingpins ) are now using so many multiple aliases and so frequently that it’s becoming difficult to keep track of who is really running what, where.”
When asked about something real interesting in a case he replied, “Well, at the top of our list is one we nicknamed ‘Philippines Phantom’ whose involved in an awful lot of international bank paper fraud schemes and he uses many aliases. We believe the Philippines Phantom has a close following of other nefarious characters using ‘his’ former aliases. At first we thought it was just other international bank paper crooks, further down the foodchain, just paying hommage to a bolder more famous crook, but then we realized the other crooks were simply too lazy and using the ‘Philippines Phantom’ alias gave them less work to do in pulling off an international bank paper fraud deal of their own.”
Who is the ‘Philippines Phantom’? When asked, no hints were given. The agent coughed and said, “That investigation is still ongoing so, no information at this time can be publicly released.”
Although no official information was released as to who the ‘Philippines Phantom’ really is, the agent suddenly asked if my laptop was online, it was and so the agent curiously visited a couple ( 2 ) foreign country websites. At each, he would go to a particular webpage, stand up from the chair and ask me if he could walk around the room and study the wallpaper. Now, I took that to indirectly indicate the agent wouldn’t be studying the webpages he was visiting ( in-private, the laptop was turned away from me ) so, I decidely took that curious opportunity to look at each webpage – long enough to copy each pertinent URL address for later review. Those two ( 2 ) webpages, UNWANTED PUBLICITY INFORMATION GROUP database files ( 16,000,000,000 pages and still growing ) and some global intelligence contacts gave my research enough information to fill this report and more.
Bank Paper Trade Tricks
Where imposters might not work as perfectly as very knowledgeable international master bank paper fraudsters, it has become easier with technology today to continue defrauding by simply changing appearances.
Fraud tricks, such as very short hair cuts ( or bald ), moustache or beard ( trimmed, cut off or added ), hair wigs ( different colors or styles ), weight loss or gain ( stuffed undergarments ), contact lens eyewear ( change eye colors ), identity papers ( different identity cards, passports, etc. ) are sometimes still used.
Smart fraud money is found where master bank paper fraudsters send-in entirely ‘new faces’ as their new ‘representatives’ whom may and are likelier now than ever before to be nothing more than unsuspecting freelance commissioned promoters acting unsuspectingly as the ‘middle-man’ or ‘broker’ for the master bank paper fraudsters whom are now disguising themselves to new unsuspecting “representatives” whom sometimes even come with respectable backgrounds. During tough economic times, a host of professionals are looking for work outside their usual occupations, and international bank paper fraudsters knowing this see tough economic times as their playground to further their own frauds and bottomline.
Modifying fraud techniques using computer enhancements can further bank paper frauds by the fraudster going one step further in obtaining and implimenting ‘security paper’ enhancing quality in the manufacturing of counterfeit bank paper and support documents for seemingly increased authenticity. Furthering fraudulent international bank paper schemes aimed at unsuspecting victims can be taken by modified avenues of fraudulent approach again and again.
Altering or completely changing a ‘fraudulent storyline’ can lead to quickly resurrecting an old fraud into something that appears entirely different, and with few knowing anything about ‘fraud transformation details’, later in the scheme another fraudulent international bank paper ( different name of an institution ) may eventually be introduced providing an unrecognizeable twist aimed at victims of fraud.
New Spy versus Spy Game – Political Opposition Leftists Confused By Right Wing Terrorist Extremists
The Philippines Phantom use of alaises, said to have been later reused by yet another host of other nefarious individuals, indicates ‘organized crime’ sophistication exercising indirect criminal subterfuge, tradecrafts used more likely by an international spy or international criminal mastermind, but in either event requires a special set of skills, excellent training and / or years of practice.
This particular case appears to have become operationalized not by a rogue spy but perhaps by a terrorist akin to the clever but infamous Carlos Illyich Ramirez-Sanchez (aka) Carlos The Jackal believed skilled in intelligence tradecrafts and used by the legacy Soviet Union KGB. More has definitely been seen out of the Philippines Phantom than most run of the mill international bank paper fraudsters and identity thieves. To remain aloof for so many decades without being caught by law enforcement whom are supposedly chasing international Asian terrorists speaks volumes as to the liklihood of another driving force that has ‘been allowing’ the Philippines Phantom to mysteriously escape punishment as was seen in 2001 ( further below ).
Naive to what non-official cover ( NOC ) government foreign intelligence agents are, according to a U.S. government federal agent working from out-of one of those fancy southern California condominium undercover teams assigned by other federal agencies, in late 2008 a non-official cover ( NOC ) government foreign intelligence agent [ Neil Benjamin Gibson ] was believed to be, amongst all the other low down dirty rotten scoundrels, an international bank paper trading fraudster, but instead was a NOC feigning to be a ‘trader’ brokering what actually turned out to be a sting operation using what appeared to be members of the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank supposedly operating a ‘secret reward recovery program’ designed by U.S. federal law enforcement agents to ensnare as many loads of the mysterious legacy “Series 1934″ U.S. Federal Reserve Notes ( FRN ) / U.S. Federal Reserve Bonds ( FRB ) and / or Federal Reserve System bearer bond coupon certificates stashed en masse throughout the Philippines and other parts of Asia.
During October 2008, in California for his meeeting with NOC agent Neil Gibson at the Los Angeles International Airport, the Filipino man arrived from the Philippines to just drop off a few samples and – he ‘thought’ – collect his U.S. Federal Reserve Bank reward. Instead, the Filipino was told a lie by Neil B. Gibson that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security ( DHS ) had to clear his reward money through channels but that the Filipino man would get his reward.
Although the Filipino man, who never gave up was nicknamed “cowboy,” he was not deported and did not receive his so-called “reward” money as Neil Gibson described, but instead was flown back to the Philippines to secure more Series 1934 U.S. Federal Reserve Notes ( FRN ) from his contact for the U.S. government. Cowboy, was a southern California traveling businessman, an international “trader,” who commuted frequently to the Philippines, France, Ukraine, and around the rest of the world as required.
Some old timers believe it got so hot during the Cold War that nations were tripping over their own spies. Today perhaps, nothing’s changed except that valuable spies are not used out front in so many exchange deals as before but instead saw non-official cover ( NOC ) government foreign intelligence agents handle the brunt of that work because they are so much cheaper to maintain and easier to plausibly deny the existence of should secret government foreign operations go awry – as often times they do.
The Philippines Phantom would not have be easy to locate background information on had it not been for the ability to review, for the purposes of this report, private intelligence dossiers, database files and other international information supplied by affiliates of the UNWANTED PUBLICITY INFORMATION GROUP.
We were initially pointed to a problem perceived coming from somewhere inside a Philippines organization known as the PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION ON GOOD GOVERNMENT ( PCGG ). Was something amiss with PCGG corporate governance? Did something unsavory surrounded PCGG chairman Camilo L. Sabio or one of her staff?
We found PCGG representative Gerry Ledonio [ TEL: (718) 358-8114 end_of_the_skype_highlighting ] being “handled” by the law firm O’BUCKLEY ( New York, USA ) that was arranging secret PCGG meetings with the southern California Filipino man nicknamed “Cowboy” who was also very much an international bank paper trader who held a plethora of fraudulent international bank paper financial instruments [ i.e. bank guarantees ( BG ), certificates of deposit ( CD ), stand-by letters of credit ( SBLC ), safe-keeping receipts ( SKR ), etc. ] accompanied by a whole host of support documents, amongst many others, where the now-late former Philippines President Ferdinand Edralin Marcos (aka) Ferdinand E. Marcos was seen named within a Letter Of Instruction naming his sidekick to be “William V. Morales,” an alias used by “Wilfredo S. Saurin” (aka) the “Philippines Phantom.”
Reference
http://upintelligence.multiply.com/photos/album/15#photo=136
Early background on Wilfredo S. Saurin found him supporting Asian terrorists and another international bank paper fraudster, Alexander Mann. Together, Saurin and Mann teamed up with Orange County, California businessman nicknamed “Tony Nguyen,” ( an alias he uses ) chairman of the GOVERNMENT OF FREE VIET NAM ( GFVN ) in Garden Grove, California where it was arranged to manufacture, distribute and sell fraudulent paper currency printed to support terrorist agendas of “Asian government” we found was actually not a real government at all but an organization that called itself the GOVERNMENT OF FREE VIET NAM ( GFVN ), a fraud money political front for an Asian terrorist splinter group garnering support from aligned nations with U.S. covert funding coup based assassinations and other destabilization efforts to overthrow the Republic Of Viet Nam, and headquartered right across the border in Cambodia we found Philippines Phantom Wilfredo Saurin leading the CHEA DAM GROUP OF COMPANIES ( Phnom Penh, Cambodia ), ASIA REAL PROPERTY CO. LTD. ( Phnom Penh, Cambodia ), ARP-OITC GROUP CO. LTD. ( Phnom Penh, Cambodia ) and THE OFFICE OF INTERNATIONAL TREASURY CONTROL ( Washington, D.C., USA ) formerly led by Ray Chhat Dam (aka) Diem C. Ray ( Cambodia ) and Keith Francis Scott ( Australia ).
We learned some of the nuances of the Philippines Phantom who was apparently skilled in martial arts but more importantly tradecrafts of spying as a foreign agent adept at the arts of infiltration and creating insurrections because he led a tight knit group of international criminal minded Asian terrorists directed to utilize a legacy U.S. Central Intelligence Agency ( CIA ) Viet Nam war time era counterfeiting operation that manufactured a cross-border ( viet Nam / Cambodia ) air lift infiltration air drop of billions in counterfeit money ( i.e. currency known as “dongs” – North Viet Nam government dollar ) that was used to make GOVERNMENT OF FREE VIET NAM ( GFVN ) currency ( sold to Vietnamese in Orange County, California, USA ) and used to design, print, distribute, and sell various forms of fraudulent but official looking paper monetary currencies, international bank paper and related support documents, identities and more used in blackmarket sales for up-front advance fee schemes as one of many fraudulent collection practices used behind the scenes to secretly fund international terrorist actions aimed primarily against specifically targeted assets ( holdings ) of the Republic of Viet Nam and its government administration from a revolutionary group known as the FREE VIETNAM REVOLUTIONARY GROUP ( FVRG ) tied to its political action arm GOVERNMENT OF FREE VIET NAM ( GFVN ) organization ( Garden Grove, California, USA ).
Although the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank ( New York, NY, USA ) cannot nor is it able to keep up with all the Philippines Phantom alias names and schemes, it does realize the Philippines Phanton has not been stopped because he continues spreading fraudulent international bank paper today. But what else can he do?
Research notes ( in reverse chronological order – below ) may shock readers whom will be provided with basic insights into where these particular Asian terrorist group extremists were harvesting others to advance their cause. An inside look at hardline politically driven criminal masterminds presenting outlandish schemes, using other people as their representatives to do their dirty work and get arrested for it, and a cornucopia of creative deceit techniques bordering on psychological treachery for victims so much so and to the extent that international bank paper fraud may disappear, but for a brief moment, when one realizes more serious crimes linked to it. Some may not understand that the Philippines Phanton is much more than just an international bank paper fraudster, terrorist or spy.
The initial list of Philippines Phantom alias names grew as additional nefarious characters – believed to be his comrades – began using his alias names plus other alias names too so, the most current list of Philippines Phantom alias names, are ( immediately below ):
Wilfredo Sarabia Saurin (also known as)
Wilfred Saurin (aka)
Datu G.L. (aka)
Wilfredo S. Ramos (aka)
William Morales (aka)
William V. Morales (aka)
Joseph E.S. Daraman Jr. (aka)
Joseph Eutiquio Severino Daraman Jr. (aka)
Joseph Daraman (aka)
Joseph Teo Hui Kiat (aka)
Johannes Riyad (aka)
Yohannes Riyadi (aka)
Saroeun Soush (aka)
Wilfredo Serion (aka)
Dr. Saroeun (aka)
Soush Saroeun
Keeping track of the alias name list ( above ) for the Philippines Phantom provided leads to research legacy information, most of which disappeared long ago, but that information along with more from the Unwanted Publicity Information Group made this report possible along with the information now available ( immediately below ) in chronological order:
- – - -
[ In RE: ( alias ) William Morales ( immediately below ) ]
Courtesy: Unwanted Publicity Information Group
BANGKOK POST ( Bangkok, Thailand )
Fifth ( 5th ) Arrest In Bond Scam, Gang On The Run - Payab Explains His Role In Police Sting
by, Anucha Charoenpo and Wassayos Ngarmkham
April 21, 2001
THAILAND, Bangkok – A fifth ( 5th ) person [ William Morales ] has been arrested and charged with the multi-billion dollar U.S. bond fraud while other gang members are believed on the run but still in Thailand. A special law enforcement task force was formed to capture them.
William Morales, a Filipino, was taken into custody on Thursday night at the Town In Town Hotel located on Rama IX Road ( Bangkok, Thailand ).
Four ( 4 ) others were arrested earlier on Thursday:
Jacqueline Enriquez ( 29 ) – PHILIPPINES;
Robert Ng ( 43 ) – PHILIPPINES;
Tan Ho Chee ( 40 ) – SINGAPORE; and,
Chai-aree Santiwongchai ( son of a local Chinese language newspaper tycoon ).
They were charged with fraud and falsification after allegedly trying to sell fake United States bonds – dated 1934 – with a face value of $24,700,000,000 ( USD ) billion.
Chai-aree Santiwongchai was additionally charged after a lawyer for a leasing company complained he had issued a bad check for 4,500,000 million baht to his client.
The counterfeit bonds were brought into the country 7-months ago and put in a deposit box at DEUTSCHE BANK ( Bangkok, Thailand ) in the name of Mr. Chai-aree SantiWongChai.
Payab Shinawatra, brother of the Thailand Prime Minister, said yesterday he had been asked by a friend who believed the bonds were authentic to seek his brother’s help to redeem them in the United States. ‘The friend who approached him’ was ‘not among the five ( 5 ) arrested suspects’, and had ‘helped arrange’ for ‘him to meet’ the people who had the bonds.
Mr. Payab Shinawatra said he informed the Prime Minister he had been approached, and later contacted crime suppression police, who began an investigation.
The sellers had changed their mind on seeing him, prompting him to inform the police.
Police searched the house of Chai-aree Santiwongchai in Lat Phrao soi 1 for a second ( 2nd ) time Thursday night and said they found more bonds, believed to be counterfeit, pictures and related documents stuffed in a steel box bearing the U.S. seal.
Deputy National Police Chief Pol Gen Sant Sarutanont said task force members would be sent to Provinces where the remaining gang members are believed to be still in hiding.
About 3-years ago some foreigners arrived in Thailand using Thai citizens as intermediaries to attempt selling ( to gullible people ) fake U.S. bonds by claiming they ‘legally inherited’ them. Prospective victims were shown a document purporting to be a Court Order confirming that the sellers could execute sale of those U.S. bonds.
Deputy National Police Chief Pol Gen Sant Sarutanont said, “On April 10, 2001 the gang tried to sell 70 bonds – each valued at $10,000,000 ( USD ) million – to a Thailand customer who sent him pictures of the bonds. The U.S. American Embassy ( Bangkok, Thailand ) declared them fakes.
Police are still investigating whether the gang had anything to do with the U.S. bonds Senator Chaowarin Latthasaksiri claimed to have recovered from Lijia cave in Kanchanaburi. Senator Chaowarin Latthasaksiri said they were part of a treasure left by Japan troops during World War II.
- – - -
[ In RE: ( alias ) William Morales ( immediately below ) ]
Courtesy: Unwanted Publicity Information Group
Source: BANGKOK POST ( Bangkok, Thailand )
Police Quandary Over Charges
Bonds Not Issued, So Fakes Not Counterfeit
by, Wassayos Ngarmkham April 21, 2001
THAILAND, Bangkok – The investigation into the counterfeit U.S. bonds case took a bizarre twist yesterday when investigators conceded they might not be able to take legal action against any of the five suspects they have arrested.
Bangkok police Crime Suppression Division ( CSD ) sources said the five ( 5 ), who have been under police detention since late last month, have been charged with forgery and fraud.
The sources said a ‘legal technicality prevents police from proceeding with the case’.
Investigators were unable to define the bonds, carrying the face value of $24,700,000,000 ( USD ) billion, as a counterfeit product. U.S. officials who were questioned as witnesses had told the CSD the U.S. government ‘had never printed bonds of that type’, which by legal interpretation, meant the documents ‘could not be considered forged’. “This means that we cannot charge them with forgery because they did not do anything which is considered an offence,” one of the sources said. He said the investigators had also charged the five ( 5 ) suspects with public fraud, but this could not proceed either since ‘no damaged party had lodged a complaint against the suspects’. “There are concerns among the officers involved that they could be sued by the five ( 5 ) suspects if they cannot find legal justifications for the arrest.”
William Morales, Jacqueline Enriquez ( 29 ) and Robert Ng ( 43 ) of the Philippines, and Tan Ho Chee ( 40 ) of Singapore and Chai-aree Santiwongchai ( son of a local Chinese-language newspaper tycoon ) were arrested late last month in a sting operation after it was alleged they possessed fake U.S. bonds.
The arrests came in the wake of a claim by Ratchaburi senator Chaowarin Latthasaksiri that a fortune in U.S. bonds was among treasure left inside a cave in Kanchanaburi province by Japan troops after World War II. It later turned out to be a hoax.
The five ( 5 ) suspects are being detained at the Bangkok Special Prison pending the outcome of the investigation.
The CSD will need the public prosecution endorsement if the five ( 5 ) are to be tried in court.
- – - -
[ In RE: FREE VIETNAM REVOLUTIONARY GROUP ( FVRG ), GOVERNMENT OF FREE VIET NAM ( GFVN ), Tony Nguyen, Ray Dam, et al. ( immediately below ) ]
Courtesy: Unwanted Publicity Information Group
Source: KYODO NEWS INTERNATIONAL ( Japan )
Asian Economic News
Japanese, Vietnamese Alleged Terrorists Charged
September 3, 2001
PHILIPPINES, Manila – Philippine immigration and police authorities filed criminal charges Monday against a Japanese man and two ( 2 ) Vietnamese men in connection with an alleged plan to bomb the Viet Nam Embassy in Manila.
Makoto Ito and the two ( 2 ) Vietnamese men – Vo Van Duc (aka) Nguyen Vinh Tan ( 41 ), a Vietnamese U.S. citizen, and Huyn Thuan Ngoc ( 42 ), a Vietnamese Switzerland citizen – were charged with violating immigration laws and illegal possession of explosives.
Immigration Commissioner Andrea Domingo told reporters that aside from overstaying in the Philippines, the three ( 3 ) alleged terrorists were also charged for the non-bailable offense of trying to overthrow an established government ( Viet Nam ).
Another suspect, Florinda Estrada-Valderama, a Filipina who allegedly owns the townhouse in San Juan, Manila Metro where the three ( 3 ) suspects were arrested Thursday, has been summoned for police questioning.
Officials indicate that the two ( 2 ) Vietnamese suspects are members of the GOVERNMENT OF FREE VIET NAM ( GFVN ), the political action arm of the militarized underground FREE VIETNAM REVOLUTIONARY GROUP ( FVRG ), that aims to free Viet Nam from communist rule military action .
Japanese suspect Makoto Ito ( 62 ) declared his innocence telling Japan media he, was a retired hotel employee seeking financial ventures in Manila, had met the two ( 2 ) other Vietnamese suspects through another acquaintance – Vietnamese U.S. citizen “Tony” – and was sharing an accommodation with them to save on rent.
[ UPI NOTE: The organization GOVERNMENT OF FREE VIET NAM ( USA ) chairman, Nguyen Huu Chanh, was already in hiding during the time period of these arrests in the Philippines, however he arranged for the aforementioned man "Tony" (aka) Tony Nguyen to become Acting Chairman of the GOVERNMENT OF FREE VIET NAM ( GFVN ) in Garden Grove, California, USA. ]
Makoto Ito said that just like him, his acquaintance [ Tony Nguyen ] was seeking financial opportunities in the Philippines, and that he [ Tony Nguyen ] even showed him [ Makoto Ito ] a photo – of himself [ Tony Nguyen ] standing with former United States of America President William J. Clinton – amongst other photos presented during the press conference.
Makoto Ito – whom immigration and police surveillance showed was with the two ( 2 ) Vietnamese in three ( 3 ) houses they occupied in Metro Manila – is believed to be a financier of the group. Ito said he had been doing a survey for a subway project and researching on possible investment opportunities in a gyro-plane assembly plant when he was arrested along with the other two ( 2 ) suspects. “I’m a former hotel employee. I’m not a terrorist. It’s a mistaken arrest,” Ito told Japan reporters in an interview.
Earlier Monday, Makoto Ito wept and cowered from cameras when he and the two ( 2 ) Vietnamese men were presented before a press conference at Philippine National Police headquarters. Bomb materials, computers, books, and photos seized from the three ( 3 ) houses occupied by the suspects were also put on display to the media.
The GOVERNMENT OF FREE VIET NAM ( USA ) leader, Nguyen Huu Chanh, is believed to be in hiding and the subject of a manhunt in the Philippines.
In a FAX statement obtained by police, Nguyen H. Chanh admitted the Philippines arrested two ( 2 ) Vietnamese members of the GOVERNMENT OF FREE VIET NAM ( GFVN ) but said the GOVERNMENT OF FREE VIET NAM ( GFVN ) is not a terrorist organization and has no affiliation with the FREE VIETNAM REVOLUTIONARY GROUP ( FVRG ). The statement further read that the GOVERNMENT OF FREE VIET NAM ( GFVN ) is a worldwide organization engaged in liberating Vietnam from communist rule “by any possible means which are NOT against humanity,” and went on to say, “GFVN is NOT a terrorist organization. We have never been intended, and never will, [ edited-out by Philippines newspaper ] carry out any terrorist acts,” adding that the alleged explosive devices – seized from houses occupied by the three ( 3 ) suspects – “are our technical material which have been used solely in research for possible upcoming operations in Viet Nam.”
The Viet Nam Embassy said that Vietnamese U.S. citizen Vo Van Duc (aka) Nguyen Vinh Tan is also wanted in connection with the Vietnam Embassy bomb scare on June 19, 2001 in Bangkok, Thailand.
Nguyen Huu Chanh, leader of the GOVERNMENT OF FREE VIET NAM ( California, USA ), said the Vietnamese U.S. citizen Vo Van Duc (aka) Nguyen Vinh Tan was continuously residing uninterupted in the Philippines since February 21, 2001 and therefore cannot be the same man Bangkok, Thailand police associate with the later Viet Nam Embassy bomb scare on June 19, 2001.
Reference
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0WDP/is_2001_Sept_10/ai_79021264
- – - -
[ In RE: GOVERNMENT OF FREE VIET NAM ( GFVN ), GFVN Gold Bullion Reserve Certificates, Tony Nguyen, Ray Dam, et al. ( immediately below ) ]
Courtesy: Unwanted Publicity Information Group
Source: THE DILIGIZER BOARD
Subject: Ray C. Dam
Posted By: dinque2121 – Registered User
Posted At: January 12, 2003 / 2:36 a.m.
Whisper, he does travel occasionally. I met him some years ago in Bangkok. At the time he had some of the “Infamous” Soekarno and Marcos GB Certificates.
At the time he was actively involved with Tony Nyugen ( General Secretary of the Government of Free Viet Nam ) and Fred Kirkpatrick, a so-called 5 star General and former Senator from Illinois ( more lies ).
Their stated objectives was to use the Certificates to raise funds for the Government of Free Viet Nam. Tony Nyugen claimed he was going to be the next PM of Vietnam once they had freed Vietnam from Communism. Tony Nyugen’s organisation operates out of California and is still sctive.
Also involved was Gary Pierce – possibly “Pearce” – (aka) Gary Poindexter and Cheryl Poindexter of C.S.I. AG, a company that claimed to hold billions of gold reserves in Chile.
They issued Government of Free Vietnam Gold Bullion Reserve Certificates and sold many of them in the Far East. Of course, try to call on them at due date and what have you got, NOTHING. Even the officers have disappeared from the addresses given.
The whole group of these people also printed their own Government of Free Viet Nam currency ( money ) and was selling it to niave Vietnamese on the basis that when they come to power in Vietnam, the money would be full legal tender and they could then claim or use it.
All a very big SCAM with very devious people / parties behind it.
Ray Dam talks well and certainly has education, which is more than I can say for all the others, however WHAT A CROCK.
I just wasted a bit of time. I did not become involved…..fortunately.
Reference
Labels: EBTC, Euro Bank Trust Corp, Euro Bank Trust Corp LLC, global scam, iboe, Lord Neil Gibson, phony, phony Lord, scam, scam artists, Scams
posted by nfleming at
12:10 PM
Top Ten List Concerning EBTC, Lord Neil B Gibson
This particular site is not owned by us but we found it interesting that someone took the time to do a top ten of the videos concerning the scamsters, players of the IBOE fraud taking place.
Lord Neil B Gibson
Lord Neil B Gibson
Labels: 419 scam, Bill Perkins, Dimitri N Kanavos, global scam, phony iboe, phony Lord, scam, scam artists
posted by nfleming at
6:15 AM
Wednesday, January 25, 2012
Shandiman documents based upon phony IBOE's
The documents below are actual documents that were used in a scam. The items listed under Available Collateral are not real, by that we mean that there is no actual funds backing them up. The U.S. Treasury does not honor the so called IBOEs. Graham Michael Shandiman is setting right in a Bangkok jail because of these type of scams.
Labels: Bill Perkins, Dimitri N Kanavos, Dr Richard Senna, EBTC, Euro Bank Trust Corp, Euro Bank Trust Corp LLC, global scam, graham shandiman, Jonathan Todd Clinard, phony documents, phony iboe, phony Lord
posted by nfleming at
10:11 AM
Monday, January 23, 2012
The Newest IBOE Scam
The document below is a scam and nothing in the document is real. There is no such thing as a gold back IBOE.
The term GREY SCREEN is a ruse by scammers and it does not exist in the real world.
If you see the words GREY SCREEN then it is a sure sign that it belongs to a scam.
The term GREY SCREEN is a ruse by scammers and it does not exist in the real world.
If you see the words GREY SCREEN then it is a sure sign that it belongs to a scam.
Labels: Bill Perkins, Dr Richard Senna, EBTC, Euro Bank Trust Corp, Euro Bank Trust Corp LLC, global scam, Jonathan Todd Clinard, Lord Neil Gibson, Mark Savonarola, scam, scam artists, Scams, UNOITC
posted by nfleming at
1:09 PM
Sunday, January 22, 2012
Friday, January 20, 2012
Commercial Redemption (UCC-1)
Commercial Redemption Rejected as Valueless
by Gregory Allan
Permission to copy granted, if reproduced without editing the content.
Offered in the Name of Our Sovereign Lord and Saviour
Jesus, the Christ, King of kings,
this first day of the ninth month, in the year of Our King, nineteen hundred ninety-nine:
A new "law process" is making the rounds. It is known as Commercial Redemption, hereinafter referred to as "CR." If you read "patriot" literature, surf the Internet, or belong to a militia or jural society, then you very likely have heard about it. I have read its praises, read the manuals, and sat through at least fifteen hours of seminars. Just as the Holy Scriptures admonish us to post warnings near an open-pit, I have written this report to explain why I believe that CR is a fraud and a trap. Anyone who does not agree with my conclusions is welcome to please offer constructive criticism, provided he has the courtesy to first read this report carefully, all the way through.
AntiBabel
Before I proceed with the body of this report, I need to lay some groundwork. It is very important in conveying ideas, that everyone speak the same language. The following definitions are my own, you won't find them just as you see them here, in any dictionary. Using numerous dictionaries, and through my studies and prayers, I have distilled them into their underlying meanings, as I see them:
Abandoned: Any thing to which no one will claim a right.
Acceptance: An oath, whereby one agrees to take on a duty or a right. One may only accept a right if entitled to it by agreement.
Agency: A contractual relationship between two or more parties, where some parties, the agents, are given authority by other parties, the principals, to act on the principals' behalf. The scope of authority granted is limited by the terms of the contract, and further limited by the rights of the principal. No agent may ever exercise authority in excess of the rights of his principal.
Certificate: An oath, professing that a statement is true.
Claim: An oath, professing that a duty is owed, usually by a party other than the one making the claim. Claims set the basis for a controversy, without which, law-forums normally cannot secure jurisdiction.
Commerce: The exchange of oaths.
Common Law: A body of oaths which are common between a specific group of people. Within any specific group, those oaths can be said to be public law. From the perspective of anyone outside a given group, the oaths of the group would be private law.
Duty: An action which a man has given his oath to do. The exercise of law.
Escheat: The right of a finder to any thing which is otherwise abandoned. The converse right of due-process demands that anyone to whom the right might belong must first be given fair-notice and opportunity to exercise his claim.
Jurisdiction: Literally, "to speak one's law." Every man begins his life with the inherent right (free-agency is from God) to make his own oaths, or to not make them. When one man assigns to another his own right to bind himself in an oath, thus allowing the second man's word to obligate the first, then the first man has granted jurisdiction, and the second has assumed it.
Law: Oath; contract; agreement; covenant; promise; as distinguished from "laws of nature," such as gravity, which are not laws, but are "facts." Law can only be made by a "meeting of the minds" between sentient beings.
Person: Any party to a given body of law. A man may be a person under one body of law but, not having given certain oaths, not be a person under another.
Registration: The act of making a record for the purpose of giving notice of a particular fact or intention to one or more parties, and granting jurisdiction to the law-forum which holds the record to decide any disputes which may arise from the subject of said registration.
Right: A power received by way of an oath, and dependent upon the terms of said oath. Breach-of-contract (failure to perform a duty) will often divest a man of any rights he may have under that contract, but may not relieve him of his duties. A man may have rights in common with others, but his own rights are to the exclusion of others. A man's rights are his property. If you cannot identify the specific contract whereby you came into the possession of a right, and the duties which you must fulfill to continue your enjoyment of that right, then you probably do not have that right at all.
Surety: An oath, promising to fulfill an obligation in the event of a damage, injury, or breach-of-contract. Also a person who has given an oath of surety.
Title: From entitlement. Evidence of a right.
You're probably not accustomed to thinking of some of these words quite in the way I've defined them. I hope that I have made their meanings much easier to understand than before. Please keep them in mind as you read the balance of this report.
Commercial Redemption in a Nutshell
I do not claim to thoroughly comprehend the complexities of CR, but I'll now attempt to explain the basics so far as I know them.
The underlying idea behind CR is that you, and nearly everyone in America, became the property of the United States and/or the "International Bankers" when your mother signed your Birth-Certificate. Then, so the story goes, those BCs are traded in commerce, and are the real basis of the American economy. Since the U.S. has no authority to own people, it instead creates a fictitious person for each one of us, and gives it a name just like ours, except spelled with all capitalized letters. This person is called a "straw-man."
The U.S. then makes and enforces various decrees, which it calls laws, and which effect all the straw-men which it created. It can do this because the laws of agency say that the creator always controls its creations. The decrees don't actually obligate the flesh-and-blood man, but since (almost) everyone is deceived into believing that the straw-man and the real-man are one and the same, no one objects. When the I.R.S. or the traffic-cop, or some other U.S.-agent somehow obligate you for a debt, the debt is not really yours, but your straw-man's. Since you are presumed to be surety for the straw-man, you are held accountable when he fails to act. When you argue with the other party in the presence of the judge, you immediately grant the judge jurisdiction, and admit that there is a controversy, thereby giving the judge the authority to make an oath and obligate you to it.
The CR solution then, is thought to be in immediately agreeing with the opposing party, by "accepting his complaint for value," and denying the existence of a controversy. No controversy, no jurisdiction. "But wait," you say, "if you accept the charge, then don't you have to pay?" No.
As the CR story goes, there's something you have to do first, to make sure you'll never have to pay. You see, this straw-man has an account with the U.S. Treasury. The account is identified by the number which you usually think of as an "SSN." This account has lots of "bucks" in it, and also somehow represents the value of your body and soul. No one I've talked to is sure how much is in each account, but I'm told that it is up to each of us to decide how much we are worth (lots of sly-smiles and winks). In my experience, those people who have the least to show for their accomplishments place the highest value on themselves.
Presumably, we can gain control over this account, or "capture the straw-man" as the lingo goes, by getting a certified-copy of his birth-certificate, and accepting it for value. Then we claim to be his first-secured creditor, and register our claim with the Secretary-of-State for one of the United States, under a body of decrees, or private, copyrighted law, which they call the "Uniform Commercial Code." This part relies on the old patriot-style argument that there are two sides to the government, the "public-side," and the "private-side." It is important, so I'm told, to register on the "public" side of the U.C.C., or the procedure won't work.
Now that you control the account, if you accept any charge "for value," then you simply instruct the charging-party to charge your account with the U.S. Treasury. Since you can presumably place any value you like on that account, you will never have to pay for anything again!
What's Wrong with this Picture?
I'll be the first to admit that the above description of the CR process is overly-simplified. But it is also substantially accurate, so far as I comprehend it. Although I will concede that it is marginally possible that CR is a valid process, the following questions and answers may bring out some important contradictions:
Regarding the birth-certificate:
Q: I thought slavery was illegal. Can governments or bankers really own people?
A: Yes. Only involuntary slavery is prohibited by the U.S. corporate charter. That same charter (Constitution) also protects private-contracts.
Q: If our mothers really signed us over to someone else at birth, then why does that someone need a straw-man? If someone holds title to you and me, then why not just produce it, and end the charade?
A: Because the charade, not whether you are actually owned by someone else is the most important point. Your rulers know that if they are to continue to rule you, it is necessary that you must continue to believe either that:
Your fate as a slave is inevitable, and you have no hope; or
If you study hard enough you will one day be delivered of all tyranny, if only you can find just the right paperwork.
Either way, they have you in their grasp.
Q: What is a birth-certificate?
A: Look, for example, at the "certificate of title" for a car. It is not a title, it just certifies that a title does exist. Since the certifier is an officer of a U.S. law-forum, that law-forum will accept the certificate as evidence of title, in the absence of the real title. Think: if the birth-certificate is a title, then why is it called a certificate? The mother almost-never signs the birth-certificate, and then, only as a witness.
Q: Then isn't a certified-copy of a certificate, just someone's promise that somebody else promised that something is true?
A: Yes.
Q: If I obtain a certified-copy of a certificate, and then burn, staple, accept-for-value, or otherwise mutilate it, will that stop the very same person from making the very same certification again?
A: No.
Q: Is it possible for me to ever get my original birth-certificate back?
A: While anything is technically possible, the real answer is no. The explanation is in two parts:
If the clerk has the document: When a clerk is elected or appointed, he gives an oath to do his job, which includes sealing all incoming documents with the Seal of his Office, and marking them with an identifier of some kind so they can be indexed and found again. Some instruments he files, which means that he keeps the originals, and some he only records, which means he makes a copy, and returns the original to its rightful-owner. Then it is his duty to protect those records from ever disappearing. If he ever allows a document to be taken from his trust, he is in deep doo-doo.
If the clerk doesn't have the document: If you ever find out who does have your original birth-certificate, he is most likely going to be someone of free-character, who owns or controls the law-forum represented by the clerk. The court itself, the U.S. law-forum, is a debter to this person. An employee cannot compel his employer/creator to do anything. No one with a position within that law-forum, not even their highest judge, will have standing to compel him.
Q: I insist on living in fantasy-land, so please indulge me a "what-if." If I do ever get my original birth-certificate back from whoever has it, will that cancel the title held by whoever might own me?
A: No. A certificate may be used as evidence of title, but is not the highest-evidence, which is the actual title. Anyone who has firsthand knowledge of facts can certify to those facts, and they can do it as many times as they please. If you get the "original-certificate" back, there is nothing to stop the same person who signed your certificate from signing another one. And, at any time the holder of the actual-title appears, the existence of a certificate is mute anyway.
Q: Does a certificate even really have to be true?
A: No, but the certifying-person can be held accountable for making a false-oath. The burden of proof is on the accuser, not the certifying-person.
Q: If the birth-certificate is only "evidence" of title, and not the actual title, then what is the actual title?
A: First, remember that we don't know for sure that anyone actually has a title to our bodies; the idea is merely a widely accepted theory. Just because it has been repeated many times, does not necessarily make it true. That said, it is probable, if there is a title, that it would be something else that your mother might she have signed, such as a "Statement of Live Birth," or the "Application for Birth-Certificate. The main point is that if you're going to spend a lot of time trying to track down the existence of a title, then at least go after the correct instrument.
Q: When other types of titles, such as land-deeds, mortgages, liens, etc., are canceled or transferred to someone else, how is that done?
A: With another instrument. If the parties want a particular law-forum to take "cognizance," which means to assume jurisdiction over the cancellation or transfer, then they will register it with the clerk for that law-forum. When a canceling instrument appears in the same law-forum's records in which the original document appears, it is said to "lay on top" of the original, and the law-forum takes cognizance that the original is now without effect.
Q: Do you know of any instance where someone's birth-certificate, or the underlying actual-title, was effectively canceled or terminated?
A: Yes. This is done many-thousands of times each day, with an instrument known as a death-certificate.
Regarding the Straw-Man:
Q: If a straw-man exists, even in peoples' minds or on paper, and if the relationship between the real-man and the straw-man is based on deception, then isn't accepting the straw-man "for value" the same as agreeing to continue a lie, and to be obligated to that lie?
A: Congratulations, you answered that one for yourself.
Q: If the straw-man is a fiction, doesn't that mean he isn't real? If he isn't real, doesn't that mean that he doesn't exist? Then why are we talking about a straw-man?
A: Yes. Yes. For the same reason that the news-media reports stories of little or no significance, just to keep you confused, it is so very-very important to your masters that you never figure out the real answers.
Regarding Claims:
Q: If I claim to own or control something, does that make it true?
A: No. You, just like anyone else, might lie or be mistaken. Remember, a claim is a statement that someone has a duty. When you claim to own something, you are stating that everyone else has a duty to leave you alone in the exclusive peaceful enjoyment of that certain something. A claim can sometimes create the presumption of a right, if unchallenged, but more often it just creates the basis for a controversy. The burden of proof is on the disputing-party, which might be a point in favor of CR, if there is no other titleholder, or if the true titleholder is unwilling or unable to produce evidence of title.
Q: What is the purpose of registering my claim with the Secretary of State, under the U.C.C.?
A: The only purpose for registering anything with a given law-forum is to grant jurisdiction to that law-forum. In doing the above, you are saying "I have made a claim. If anyone disputes my claim, then the law-forum in which I have registered it has the jurisdiction to decide who has the higher claim. Please use the U.C.C. as the common-law upon which to base your decision. I have voluntarily waived any objection to the probable fact that the only likely adverse claimant is the same person who created and, therefore controls this law-forum." If you examine this statement carefully you will understand that if the adverse claimant does control the court, then your waiver-by-registration gives the court permission to take silent judicial notice that you have no standing; have failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and dismiss the case without even the obligation of explaining why. This drawback more-than negates any possible advantage gained from paragraph "A" above.
Q: But what if I'm careful to register with the "public side" of the U.C.C.?
A: The U.C.C. is a body of law, not a law-forum. It cannot make decisions, it is only a set of rules which can be used by a law-forum to help in the decision-making process. Please reread my definitions of "common-law," and "registration." Prior to registering your claim you may or may not be contractually obligated to observe the U.C.C. If you are not, then to you it is foreign private-law. Upon registering your claim with a clerk for a U.S. law-forum, it is now under their jurisdiction, and the U.C.C. is your public-law. Congratulations, you've successfully registered your U.C.C.-1 on the public side!
Regarding Acceptance:
Q: Can I accept someone else's right, without their consent, and make it mine?
A: No. Therefore, your "acceptance" is merely a claim. You can claim any right you want, but that doesn't mean it's really yours. If I accept your car for value, is it now mine? Of course not. Before you can accept a thing from someone, they must first offer it.
Q: When someone charges me with something, is he making me an offer, and if so, what is he offering?
A: If you damage or injure someone, or breach the terms of a contract in which you are a party, and someone charges you for that, he is making a claim, stating that you have a duty to make restitution, and he has a right to be restored. He is offering you the opportunity to demonstrate whether you are an honorable man, or a lawless heathen. Honor means that you are collectable. If you are honorable, you have the duty to act honorably. All duties have corresponding rights. You now have either the right to accept the duty to restore the claimant, or the duty to dispute his claim of a right. If you fail to do either, you have left the claimant without a remedy; you are acting without law or honor, and have abandoned your right to "speak your law" (see the definitions for "jurisdiction," "abandoned," and "escheat."
Q: If I accept a duty, does that mean I am obligated to fulfill it?
A: Of course.
Q: What happens if I accept a charge "for value," instruct the charging-party to get payment from the U.S. Treasury, or any other third-party over whom I have no direct control, and then the third-party doesn't pay?
A: When you accept a duty, "for value" or otherwise, that duty becomes yours. The charging-party is not obligated to collect from a third-party, any more than you can obligate a third-party without their prior consent. The charging-party may or may not choose to even try to collect from the third-party, and unless you demonstrate to the charging-party a very strong contractual obligation on behalf of the third-party, he probably will not. In any case, once the duty has been accepted, restitution must be made. You accepted the duty, and you are now the ultimate surety for its satisfaction.
Q: If I decide to try CR and it blows up in my face, can I later claim that the straw-man doesn't really exist and, therefore, the obligation doesn't either?
A: Again, you can claim what you want, but that doesn't make it true. The straw-man isn't real, but you are. Once you've accepted a duty, the burden of proof shifts to you if for any reason you fail to perform.
Silver Bullets
It seems like a lifetime has passed since I became involved with the "patriot movement," as many people call it, though it has only been about seven years, and I no longer consider myself a patriot now that I know the meaning of the word, and its implications. Though I may not be an "old-timer" in the sense of years, I have studied much and worked hard. I've seen many new "processes" come and go, all of them thought to be the silver-bullet which would slay the beast called Tyranny. Some of them were ridiculous from the outset, though I didn't know it at the time. Some worked for a time, and later were defeated. A few are valid, and when used correctly will work sometimes, depending on how they are applied, and how vital the issue is to the adversary. But none is the proverbial "silver-bullet." That doesn't, and should not, stop us from trying. Hopefully we will learn from our mistakes.
My perspective of the world, based on my study of history, can be summed up briefly:
The greatest influence on society, since the beginning of time, has been man's desire and ability to inflict violence on his neighbors.
When man was a hunter-gatherer there was very little incentive for violence, since he could not easily save more food than he could acquire in a day. He moved around a lot, so material possessions were more of a hindrance than a benefit. An occasional squabble over a woman was pretty much the extent of conflicts. As man learned to farm, he became increasingly violent. Now he could produce much more in a day than he could eat, and he learned to store it for the future. If others came into the area and tried to take what he had worked for, he would fight. People learned to band together for protection, and also for conquest (theft). Most people did not want to concern themselves with protection on a daily basis, so they hired people who were more interested in violence, and paid them with their excess. Successful farmers could afford a lot of soldiers, and soon found that hiring those soldiers to steal the work of others was a lot less work than farming. Soldiers also often took matters into their own hands.
Thus have evolved governments. And so long as governments are not perceived by the people to steal too much, or to be excessively violent, most people will tolerate them in exchange for protection from outside conquest which they fear might be more severe. The only difference between a modern government and a mafia-style protection-racket, is its size and scope. For its authority, government does not rely upon law, but upon its perceived capacity to do violence in exchange for noncompliance.
Notice my reliance upon the word "perceived." The people who rule over large numbers of people are, by definition, outnumbered. They know that they could never win a battle where their own subjects were determined to defeat them. They must rely heavily upon the good-faith of the people, to maintain their position. If that good-faith ever waivers, governments will do anything necessary to reclaim it.
Those of us who have studied history and government know that we live everyday with a great deal of fraud, and we suspect that we are only aware of the tip of an iceberg. But we are a minority. Most people believe the Big-Lie. If enough fall away, then almost invariably a charismatic government-shepherd will appear to lead them back into the fold.
When I first began my study of law, I believed that if I could find just the right paperwork, and if I could draft it flawlessly, and use the correct procedure, then the government-agencies who were set upon stealing from me or controlling me would have to give up, and go away. I now see the folly of that belief. However, I have discovered that governments will always do the "right thing" in a situation where a large number of people are paying close attention. The trick is to wake people up and make them watch, and care.
We know how difficult it is to bring people around to our point of view. Governments have had an iron-fisted control over the education of our children for so long, that even stark reason is sometimes hard to get across to them. No matter what procedure we use to try and separate from Babylon, governments will try to resist letting us go. They will, no doubt, trump up charges in an attempt to demonize us, and turn the common man against us. If we use a procedure which is not understandable by the common man, then we make governments' job easy for them. If we find and use a procedure which is easily understandable, the common man will probably still not support us, but it will be much more difficult for governments to move him to actively prosecute us, or even to stand by idly while others do.
I have already stated that I do not fully comprehend the CR process, even though I have made much more effort to do so than most people, even "patriot-types," ever will. I am not a stupid man, and I think it is safe to assume that if I don't see the validity of CR now, then most people will never understand it. That means that even if CR is a valid process, it will never ultimately achieve its intended purpose.
Worse yet, the CR process involves commercial instruments which use the banking system and the U.S. Treasury. The last process we saw which used similar tactics was put forth by the Montana Freemen, and resulted in many of our own friends going to prison. I do not believe that their procedure was valid, but even if it was, they were not able to convince a jury. They were not able to turn public-opinion in their favor. Right or wrong, they were prosecuted. We expect persecution in our quest for freedom. Many of us are willing, if necessary, to go to prison for being right. But who wants to go to prison for being wrong?
I believe that the Commercial Redemption process is wrong. I also believe, for the reasons stated directly above, that even if someone can now prove to me that CR is valid, it is nevertheless still wrong. The only chance we have of ever finding a "silver-bullet," is in using a valid procedure which is understandable by the common man.
It is my prayer that the reader will carefully consider all of the above points, and accept them for value. In my next article I hope to present a procedure which I believe fulfills the requirements I have set forth above
by Gregory Allan
Permission to copy granted, if reproduced without editing the content.
Offered in the Name of Our Sovereign Lord and Saviour
Jesus, the Christ, King of kings,
this first day of the ninth month, in the year of Our King, nineteen hundred ninety-nine:
A new "law process" is making the rounds. It is known as Commercial Redemption, hereinafter referred to as "CR." If you read "patriot" literature, surf the Internet, or belong to a militia or jural society, then you very likely have heard about it. I have read its praises, read the manuals, and sat through at least fifteen hours of seminars. Just as the Holy Scriptures admonish us to post warnings near an open-pit, I have written this report to explain why I believe that CR is a fraud and a trap. Anyone who does not agree with my conclusions is welcome to please offer constructive criticism, provided he has the courtesy to first read this report carefully, all the way through.
AntiBabel
Before I proceed with the body of this report, I need to lay some groundwork. It is very important in conveying ideas, that everyone speak the same language. The following definitions are my own, you won't find them just as you see them here, in any dictionary. Using numerous dictionaries, and through my studies and prayers, I have distilled them into their underlying meanings, as I see them:
Abandoned: Any thing to which no one will claim a right.
Acceptance: An oath, whereby one agrees to take on a duty or a right. One may only accept a right if entitled to it by agreement.
Agency: A contractual relationship between two or more parties, where some parties, the agents, are given authority by other parties, the principals, to act on the principals' behalf. The scope of authority granted is limited by the terms of the contract, and further limited by the rights of the principal. No agent may ever exercise authority in excess of the rights of his principal.
Certificate: An oath, professing that a statement is true.
Claim: An oath, professing that a duty is owed, usually by a party other than the one making the claim. Claims set the basis for a controversy, without which, law-forums normally cannot secure jurisdiction.
Commerce: The exchange of oaths.
Common Law: A body of oaths which are common between a specific group of people. Within any specific group, those oaths can be said to be public law. From the perspective of anyone outside a given group, the oaths of the group would be private law.
Duty: An action which a man has given his oath to do. The exercise of law.
Escheat: The right of a finder to any thing which is otherwise abandoned. The converse right of due-process demands that anyone to whom the right might belong must first be given fair-notice and opportunity to exercise his claim.
Jurisdiction: Literally, "to speak one's law." Every man begins his life with the inherent right (free-agency is from God) to make his own oaths, or to not make them. When one man assigns to another his own right to bind himself in an oath, thus allowing the second man's word to obligate the first, then the first man has granted jurisdiction, and the second has assumed it.
Law: Oath; contract; agreement; covenant; promise; as distinguished from "laws of nature," such as gravity, which are not laws, but are "facts." Law can only be made by a "meeting of the minds" between sentient beings.
Person: Any party to a given body of law. A man may be a person under one body of law but, not having given certain oaths, not be a person under another.
Registration: The act of making a record for the purpose of giving notice of a particular fact or intention to one or more parties, and granting jurisdiction to the law-forum which holds the record to decide any disputes which may arise from the subject of said registration.
Right: A power received by way of an oath, and dependent upon the terms of said oath. Breach-of-contract (failure to perform a duty) will often divest a man of any rights he may have under that contract, but may not relieve him of his duties. A man may have rights in common with others, but his own rights are to the exclusion of others. A man's rights are his property. If you cannot identify the specific contract whereby you came into the possession of a right, and the duties which you must fulfill to continue your enjoyment of that right, then you probably do not have that right at all.
Surety: An oath, promising to fulfill an obligation in the event of a damage, injury, or breach-of-contract. Also a person who has given an oath of surety.
Title: From entitlement. Evidence of a right.
You're probably not accustomed to thinking of some of these words quite in the way I've defined them. I hope that I have made their meanings much easier to understand than before. Please keep them in mind as you read the balance of this report.
Commercial Redemption in a Nutshell
I do not claim to thoroughly comprehend the complexities of CR, but I'll now attempt to explain the basics so far as I know them.
The underlying idea behind CR is that you, and nearly everyone in America, became the property of the United States and/or the "International Bankers" when your mother signed your Birth-Certificate. Then, so the story goes, those BCs are traded in commerce, and are the real basis of the American economy. Since the U.S. has no authority to own people, it instead creates a fictitious person for each one of us, and gives it a name just like ours, except spelled with all capitalized letters. This person is called a "straw-man."
The U.S. then makes and enforces various decrees, which it calls laws, and which effect all the straw-men which it created. It can do this because the laws of agency say that the creator always controls its creations. The decrees don't actually obligate the flesh-and-blood man, but since (almost) everyone is deceived into believing that the straw-man and the real-man are one and the same, no one objects. When the I.R.S. or the traffic-cop, or some other U.S.-agent somehow obligate you for a debt, the debt is not really yours, but your straw-man's. Since you are presumed to be surety for the straw-man, you are held accountable when he fails to act. When you argue with the other party in the presence of the judge, you immediately grant the judge jurisdiction, and admit that there is a controversy, thereby giving the judge the authority to make an oath and obligate you to it.
The CR solution then, is thought to be in immediately agreeing with the opposing party, by "accepting his complaint for value," and denying the existence of a controversy. No controversy, no jurisdiction. "But wait," you say, "if you accept the charge, then don't you have to pay?" No.
As the CR story goes, there's something you have to do first, to make sure you'll never have to pay. You see, this straw-man has an account with the U.S. Treasury. The account is identified by the number which you usually think of as an "SSN." This account has lots of "bucks" in it, and also somehow represents the value of your body and soul. No one I've talked to is sure how much is in each account, but I'm told that it is up to each of us to decide how much we are worth (lots of sly-smiles and winks). In my experience, those people who have the least to show for their accomplishments place the highest value on themselves.
Presumably, we can gain control over this account, or "capture the straw-man" as the lingo goes, by getting a certified-copy of his birth-certificate, and accepting it for value. Then we claim to be his first-secured creditor, and register our claim with the Secretary-of-State for one of the United States, under a body of decrees, or private, copyrighted law, which they call the "Uniform Commercial Code." This part relies on the old patriot-style argument that there are two sides to the government, the "public-side," and the "private-side." It is important, so I'm told, to register on the "public" side of the U.C.C., or the procedure won't work.
Now that you control the account, if you accept any charge "for value," then you simply instruct the charging-party to charge your account with the U.S. Treasury. Since you can presumably place any value you like on that account, you will never have to pay for anything again!
What's Wrong with this Picture?
I'll be the first to admit that the above description of the CR process is overly-simplified. But it is also substantially accurate, so far as I comprehend it. Although I will concede that it is marginally possible that CR is a valid process, the following questions and answers may bring out some important contradictions:
Regarding the birth-certificate:
Q: I thought slavery was illegal. Can governments or bankers really own people?
A: Yes. Only involuntary slavery is prohibited by the U.S. corporate charter. That same charter (Constitution) also protects private-contracts.
Q: If our mothers really signed us over to someone else at birth, then why does that someone need a straw-man? If someone holds title to you and me, then why not just produce it, and end the charade?
A: Because the charade, not whether you are actually owned by someone else is the most important point. Your rulers know that if they are to continue to rule you, it is necessary that you must continue to believe either that:
Your fate as a slave is inevitable, and you have no hope; or
If you study hard enough you will one day be delivered of all tyranny, if only you can find just the right paperwork.
Either way, they have you in their grasp.
Q: What is a birth-certificate?
A: Look, for example, at the "certificate of title" for a car. It is not a title, it just certifies that a title does exist. Since the certifier is an officer of a U.S. law-forum, that law-forum will accept the certificate as evidence of title, in the absence of the real title. Think: if the birth-certificate is a title, then why is it called a certificate? The mother almost-never signs the birth-certificate, and then, only as a witness.
Q: Then isn't a certified-copy of a certificate, just someone's promise that somebody else promised that something is true?
A: Yes.
Q: If I obtain a certified-copy of a certificate, and then burn, staple, accept-for-value, or otherwise mutilate it, will that stop the very same person from making the very same certification again?
A: No.
Q: Is it possible for me to ever get my original birth-certificate back?
A: While anything is technically possible, the real answer is no. The explanation is in two parts:
If the clerk has the document: When a clerk is elected or appointed, he gives an oath to do his job, which includes sealing all incoming documents with the Seal of his Office, and marking them with an identifier of some kind so they can be indexed and found again. Some instruments he files, which means that he keeps the originals, and some he only records, which means he makes a copy, and returns the original to its rightful-owner. Then it is his duty to protect those records from ever disappearing. If he ever allows a document to be taken from his trust, he is in deep doo-doo.
If the clerk doesn't have the document: If you ever find out who does have your original birth-certificate, he is most likely going to be someone of free-character, who owns or controls the law-forum represented by the clerk. The court itself, the U.S. law-forum, is a debter to this person. An employee cannot compel his employer/creator to do anything. No one with a position within that law-forum, not even their highest judge, will have standing to compel him.
Q: I insist on living in fantasy-land, so please indulge me a "what-if." If I do ever get my original birth-certificate back from whoever has it, will that cancel the title held by whoever might own me?
A: No. A certificate may be used as evidence of title, but is not the highest-evidence, which is the actual title. Anyone who has firsthand knowledge of facts can certify to those facts, and they can do it as many times as they please. If you get the "original-certificate" back, there is nothing to stop the same person who signed your certificate from signing another one. And, at any time the holder of the actual-title appears, the existence of a certificate is mute anyway.
Q: Does a certificate even really have to be true?
A: No, but the certifying-person can be held accountable for making a false-oath. The burden of proof is on the accuser, not the certifying-person.
Q: If the birth-certificate is only "evidence" of title, and not the actual title, then what is the actual title?
A: First, remember that we don't know for sure that anyone actually has a title to our bodies; the idea is merely a widely accepted theory. Just because it has been repeated many times, does not necessarily make it true. That said, it is probable, if there is a title, that it would be something else that your mother might she have signed, such as a "Statement of Live Birth," or the "Application for Birth-Certificate. The main point is that if you're going to spend a lot of time trying to track down the existence of a title, then at least go after the correct instrument.
Q: When other types of titles, such as land-deeds, mortgages, liens, etc., are canceled or transferred to someone else, how is that done?
A: With another instrument. If the parties want a particular law-forum to take "cognizance," which means to assume jurisdiction over the cancellation or transfer, then they will register it with the clerk for that law-forum. When a canceling instrument appears in the same law-forum's records in which the original document appears, it is said to "lay on top" of the original, and the law-forum takes cognizance that the original is now without effect.
Q: Do you know of any instance where someone's birth-certificate, or the underlying actual-title, was effectively canceled or terminated?
A: Yes. This is done many-thousands of times each day, with an instrument known as a death-certificate.
Regarding the Straw-Man:
Q: If a straw-man exists, even in peoples' minds or on paper, and if the relationship between the real-man and the straw-man is based on deception, then isn't accepting the straw-man "for value" the same as agreeing to continue a lie, and to be obligated to that lie?
A: Congratulations, you answered that one for yourself.
Q: If the straw-man is a fiction, doesn't that mean he isn't real? If he isn't real, doesn't that mean that he doesn't exist? Then why are we talking about a straw-man?
A: Yes. Yes. For the same reason that the news-media reports stories of little or no significance, just to keep you confused, it is so very-very important to your masters that you never figure out the real answers.
Regarding Claims:
Q: If I claim to own or control something, does that make it true?
A: No. You, just like anyone else, might lie or be mistaken. Remember, a claim is a statement that someone has a duty. When you claim to own something, you are stating that everyone else has a duty to leave you alone in the exclusive peaceful enjoyment of that certain something. A claim can sometimes create the presumption of a right, if unchallenged, but more often it just creates the basis for a controversy. The burden of proof is on the disputing-party, which might be a point in favor of CR, if there is no other titleholder, or if the true titleholder is unwilling or unable to produce evidence of title.
Q: What is the purpose of registering my claim with the Secretary of State, under the U.C.C.?
A: The only purpose for registering anything with a given law-forum is to grant jurisdiction to that law-forum. In doing the above, you are saying "I have made a claim. If anyone disputes my claim, then the law-forum in which I have registered it has the jurisdiction to decide who has the higher claim. Please use the U.C.C. as the common-law upon which to base your decision. I have voluntarily waived any objection to the probable fact that the only likely adverse claimant is the same person who created and, therefore controls this law-forum." If you examine this statement carefully you will understand that if the adverse claimant does control the court, then your waiver-by-registration gives the court permission to take silent judicial notice that you have no standing; have failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and dismiss the case without even the obligation of explaining why. This drawback more-than negates any possible advantage gained from paragraph "A" above.
Q: But what if I'm careful to register with the "public side" of the U.C.C.?
A: The U.C.C. is a body of law, not a law-forum. It cannot make decisions, it is only a set of rules which can be used by a law-forum to help in the decision-making process. Please reread my definitions of "common-law," and "registration." Prior to registering your claim you may or may not be contractually obligated to observe the U.C.C. If you are not, then to you it is foreign private-law. Upon registering your claim with a clerk for a U.S. law-forum, it is now under their jurisdiction, and the U.C.C. is your public-law. Congratulations, you've successfully registered your U.C.C.-1 on the public side!
Regarding Acceptance:
Q: Can I accept someone else's right, without their consent, and make it mine?
A: No. Therefore, your "acceptance" is merely a claim. You can claim any right you want, but that doesn't mean it's really yours. If I accept your car for value, is it now mine? Of course not. Before you can accept a thing from someone, they must first offer it.
Q: When someone charges me with something, is he making me an offer, and if so, what is he offering?
A: If you damage or injure someone, or breach the terms of a contract in which you are a party, and someone charges you for that, he is making a claim, stating that you have a duty to make restitution, and he has a right to be restored. He is offering you the opportunity to demonstrate whether you are an honorable man, or a lawless heathen. Honor means that you are collectable. If you are honorable, you have the duty to act honorably. All duties have corresponding rights. You now have either the right to accept the duty to restore the claimant, or the duty to dispute his claim of a right. If you fail to do either, you have left the claimant without a remedy; you are acting without law or honor, and have abandoned your right to "speak your law" (see the definitions for "jurisdiction," "abandoned," and "escheat."
Q: If I accept a duty, does that mean I am obligated to fulfill it?
A: Of course.
Q: What happens if I accept a charge "for value," instruct the charging-party to get payment from the U.S. Treasury, or any other third-party over whom I have no direct control, and then the third-party doesn't pay?
A: When you accept a duty, "for value" or otherwise, that duty becomes yours. The charging-party is not obligated to collect from a third-party, any more than you can obligate a third-party without their prior consent. The charging-party may or may not choose to even try to collect from the third-party, and unless you demonstrate to the charging-party a very strong contractual obligation on behalf of the third-party, he probably will not. In any case, once the duty has been accepted, restitution must be made. You accepted the duty, and you are now the ultimate surety for its satisfaction.
Q: If I decide to try CR and it blows up in my face, can I later claim that the straw-man doesn't really exist and, therefore, the obligation doesn't either?
A: Again, you can claim what you want, but that doesn't make it true. The straw-man isn't real, but you are. Once you've accepted a duty, the burden of proof shifts to you if for any reason you fail to perform.
Silver Bullets
It seems like a lifetime has passed since I became involved with the "patriot movement," as many people call it, though it has only been about seven years, and I no longer consider myself a patriot now that I know the meaning of the word, and its implications. Though I may not be an "old-timer" in the sense of years, I have studied much and worked hard. I've seen many new "processes" come and go, all of them thought to be the silver-bullet which would slay the beast called Tyranny. Some of them were ridiculous from the outset, though I didn't know it at the time. Some worked for a time, and later were defeated. A few are valid, and when used correctly will work sometimes, depending on how they are applied, and how vital the issue is to the adversary. But none is the proverbial "silver-bullet." That doesn't, and should not, stop us from trying. Hopefully we will learn from our mistakes.
My perspective of the world, based on my study of history, can be summed up briefly:
The greatest influence on society, since the beginning of time, has been man's desire and ability to inflict violence on his neighbors.
When man was a hunter-gatherer there was very little incentive for violence, since he could not easily save more food than he could acquire in a day. He moved around a lot, so material possessions were more of a hindrance than a benefit. An occasional squabble over a woman was pretty much the extent of conflicts. As man learned to farm, he became increasingly violent. Now he could produce much more in a day than he could eat, and he learned to store it for the future. If others came into the area and tried to take what he had worked for, he would fight. People learned to band together for protection, and also for conquest (theft). Most people did not want to concern themselves with protection on a daily basis, so they hired people who were more interested in violence, and paid them with their excess. Successful farmers could afford a lot of soldiers, and soon found that hiring those soldiers to steal the work of others was a lot less work than farming. Soldiers also often took matters into their own hands.
Thus have evolved governments. And so long as governments are not perceived by the people to steal too much, or to be excessively violent, most people will tolerate them in exchange for protection from outside conquest which they fear might be more severe. The only difference between a modern government and a mafia-style protection-racket, is its size and scope. For its authority, government does not rely upon law, but upon its perceived capacity to do violence in exchange for noncompliance.
Notice my reliance upon the word "perceived." The people who rule over large numbers of people are, by definition, outnumbered. They know that they could never win a battle where their own subjects were determined to defeat them. They must rely heavily upon the good-faith of the people, to maintain their position. If that good-faith ever waivers, governments will do anything necessary to reclaim it.
Those of us who have studied history and government know that we live everyday with a great deal of fraud, and we suspect that we are only aware of the tip of an iceberg. But we are a minority. Most people believe the Big-Lie. If enough fall away, then almost invariably a charismatic government-shepherd will appear to lead them back into the fold.
When I first began my study of law, I believed that if I could find just the right paperwork, and if I could draft it flawlessly, and use the correct procedure, then the government-agencies who were set upon stealing from me or controlling me would have to give up, and go away. I now see the folly of that belief. However, I have discovered that governments will always do the "right thing" in a situation where a large number of people are paying close attention. The trick is to wake people up and make them watch, and care.
We know how difficult it is to bring people around to our point of view. Governments have had an iron-fisted control over the education of our children for so long, that even stark reason is sometimes hard to get across to them. No matter what procedure we use to try and separate from Babylon, governments will try to resist letting us go. They will, no doubt, trump up charges in an attempt to demonize us, and turn the common man against us. If we use a procedure which is not understandable by the common man, then we make governments' job easy for them. If we find and use a procedure which is easily understandable, the common man will probably still not support us, but it will be much more difficult for governments to move him to actively prosecute us, or even to stand by idly while others do.
I have already stated that I do not fully comprehend the CR process, even though I have made much more effort to do so than most people, even "patriot-types," ever will. I am not a stupid man, and I think it is safe to assume that if I don't see the validity of CR now, then most people will never understand it. That means that even if CR is a valid process, it will never ultimately achieve its intended purpose.
Worse yet, the CR process involves commercial instruments which use the banking system and the U.S. Treasury. The last process we saw which used similar tactics was put forth by the Montana Freemen, and resulted in many of our own friends going to prison. I do not believe that their procedure was valid, but even if it was, they were not able to convince a jury. They were not able to turn public-opinion in their favor. Right or wrong, they were prosecuted. We expect persecution in our quest for freedom. Many of us are willing, if necessary, to go to prison for being right. But who wants to go to prison for being wrong?
I believe that the Commercial Redemption process is wrong. I also believe, for the reasons stated directly above, that even if someone can now prove to me that CR is valid, it is nevertheless still wrong. The only chance we have of ever finding a "silver-bullet," is in using a valid procedure which is understandable by the common man.
It is my prayer that the reader will carefully consider all of the above points, and accept them for value. In my next article I hope to present a procedure which I believe fulfills the requirements I have set forth above
Labels: Bill Perkins, Dimitri N Kanavos, Dr Richard Senna, EBTC, Euro Bank Trust Corp, Euro Bank Trust Corp LLC, global scam, iboe, Lord Neil Gibson, phony iboe, scam, scam artists, Scams
posted by nfleming at
8:23 AM
Previous Posts
- This is the January 29th, 2012 Tesoro Broadcast
- Spy or Terrorist
- Top Ten List Concerning EBTC, Lord Neil B Gibson
- Shandiman documents based upon phony IBOE's
- The Newest IBOE Scam
- This is the January 22nd, 2012 Tesoro Broadcast
- Commercial Redemption (UCC-1)
- More Information concerning some of the Scammers
- Have we uncovered Foundation X leads to UNOITC
- The Keenan lawsuit and the phony UNOITC
Archives
- Feb 6, 2007
- Mar 2, 2007
- Mar 13, 2007
- Apr 8, 2007
- Apr 23, 2007
- May 28, 2007
- May 31, 2007
- Jun 5, 2007
- Jun 17, 2007
- Jun 28, 2007
- Jul 3, 2007
- Jul 12, 2007
- Jul 13, 2007
- Jul 24, 2007
- Jul 31, 2007
- Aug 1, 2007
- Aug 13, 2007
- Sep 4, 2007
- Sep 27, 2007
- Sep 30, 2007
- Oct 12, 2007
- Oct 26, 2007
- Nov 11, 2007
- Nov 24, 2007
- Dec 10, 2007
- Jan 2, 2008
- Jan 7, 2008
- Jan 29, 2008
- Feb 23, 2008
- Feb 24, 2008
- Mar 1, 2008
- Mar 5, 2008
- Mar 15, 2008
- Mar 19, 2008
- Mar 27, 2008
- Mar 31, 2008
- Apr 9, 2008
- Apr 12, 2008
- Apr 16, 2008
- Apr 17, 2008
- Apr 23, 2008
- Apr 29, 2008
- May 8, 2008
- May 11, 2008
- May 17, 2008
- May 27, 2008
- Jun 7, 2008
- Jun 10, 2008
- Jun 13, 2008
- Jun 15, 2008
- Jun 20, 2008
- Jul 4, 2008
- Jul 7, 2008
- Jul 8, 2008
- Jul 10, 2008
- Jul 11, 2008
- Jul 13, 2008
- Jul 14, 2008
- Jul 15, 2008
- Jul 22, 2008
- Jul 29, 2008
- Aug 2, 2008
- Aug 12, 2008
- Aug 24, 2008
- Aug 28, 2008
- Sep 5, 2008
- Sep 7, 2008
- Sep 12, 2008
- Sep 14, 2008
- Sep 16, 2008
- Sep 21, 2008
- Sep 22, 2008
- Sep 29, 2008
- Oct 1, 2008
- Oct 3, 2008
- Oct 6, 2008
- Oct 9, 2008
- Oct 12, 2008
- Oct 21, 2008
- Oct 22, 2008
- Oct 23, 2008
- Oct 25, 2008
- Oct 26, 2008
- Nov 3, 2008
- Nov 4, 2008
- Nov 26, 2008
- Nov 30, 2008
- Dec 5, 2008
- Dec 8, 2008
- Dec 9, 2008
- Dec 16, 2008
- Dec 25, 2008
- Dec 31, 2008
- Jan 1, 2009
- Jan 4, 2009
- Jan 5, 2009
- Jan 7, 2009
- Jan 12, 2009
- Jan 14, 2009
- Jan 17, 2009
- Jan 18, 2009
- Jan 19, 2009
- Jan 24, 2009
- Jan 26, 2009
- Jan 27, 2009
- Jan 28, 2009
- Jan 29, 2009
- Jan 30, 2009
- Jan 31, 2009
- Feb 1, 2009
- Feb 2, 2009
- Feb 4, 2009
- Feb 6, 2009
- Feb 8, 2009
- Feb 9, 2009
- Feb 12, 2009
- Feb 14, 2009
- Feb 16, 2009
- Feb 17, 2009
- Feb 18, 2009
- Feb 20, 2009
- Feb 25, 2009
- Mar 2, 2009
- Mar 4, 2009
- Mar 9, 2009
- Mar 10, 2009
- Mar 11, 2009
- Mar 15, 2009
- Mar 16, 2009
- Mar 20, 2009
- Mar 22, 2009
- Mar 25, 2009
- Mar 27, 2009
- Mar 29, 2009
- Mar 31, 2009
- Apr 1, 2009
- Apr 4, 2009
- Apr 5, 2009
- Apr 7, 2009
- Apr 8, 2009
- Apr 9, 2009
- Apr 10, 2009
- Apr 12, 2009
- Apr 13, 2009
- Apr 15, 2009
- Apr 16, 2009
- Apr 17, 2009
- Apr 19, 2009
- Apr 21, 2009
- Apr 22, 2009
- Apr 23, 2009
- Apr 24, 2009
- Apr 28, 2009
- Apr 29, 2009
- Apr 30, 2009
- May 3, 2009
- May 4, 2009
- May 5, 2009
- May 7, 2009
- May 9, 2009
- May 10, 2009
- May 11, 2009
- May 13, 2009
- May 14, 2009
- May 15, 2009
- May 16, 2009
- May 17, 2009
- May 19, 2009
- May 20, 2009
- May 21, 2009
- May 24, 2009
- May 27, 2009
- May 30, 2009
- May 31, 2009
- Jun 7, 2009
- Jun 15, 2009
- Jun 18, 2009
- Jun 19, 2009
- Jun 28, 2009
- Jun 29, 2009
- Jun 30, 2009
- Jul 1, 2009
- Jul 2, 2009
- Jul 4, 2009
- Jul 16, 2009
- Jul 19, 2009
- Jul 20, 2009
- Jul 21, 2009
- Jul 30, 2009
- Aug 4, 2009
- Aug 5, 2009
- Aug 7, 2009
- Aug 9, 2009
- Aug 13, 2009
- Aug 16, 2009
- Aug 17, 2009
- Aug 23, 2009
- Aug 25, 2009
- Aug 27, 2009
- Aug 28, 2009
- Aug 30, 2009
- Aug 31, 2009
- Sep 2, 2009
- Sep 5, 2009
- Sep 8, 2009
- Sep 10, 2009
- Sep 13, 2009
- Sep 14, 2009
- Sep 20, 2009
- Sep 27, 2009
- Sep 30, 2009
- Oct 4, 2009
- Oct 5, 2009
- Oct 6, 2009
- Oct 11, 2009
- Oct 18, 2009
- Oct 20, 2009
- Oct 25, 2009
- Oct 31, 2009
- Nov 4, 2009
- Nov 5, 2009
- Nov 8, 2009
- Nov 15, 2009
- Nov 17, 2009
- Nov 22, 2009
- Nov 29, 2009
- Dec 6, 2009
- Dec 9, 2009
- Dec 10, 2009
- Dec 13, 2009
- Dec 15, 2009
- Dec 16, 2009
- Dec 20, 2009
- Dec 22, 2009
- Dec 25, 2009
- Dec 27, 2009
- Dec 31, 2009
- Jan 3, 2010
- Jan 10, 2010
- Jan 17, 2010
- Jan 18, 2010
- Jan 20, 2010
- Jan 21, 2010
- Jan 24, 2010
- Jan 26, 2010
- Jan 31, 2010
- Feb 1, 2010
- Feb 3, 2010
- Feb 7, 2010
- Feb 11, 2010
- Feb 12, 2010
- Feb 13, 2010
- Feb 14, 2010
- Feb 20, 2010
- Feb 21, 2010
- Feb 27, 2010
- Feb 28, 2010
- Mar 1, 2010
- Mar 7, 2010
- Mar 14, 2010
- Mar 21, 2010
- Mar 24, 2010
- Mar 28, 2010
- Apr 4, 2010
- Apr 11, 2010
- Apr 12, 2010
- Apr 14, 2010
- Apr 15, 2010
- Apr 17, 2010
- Apr 18, 2010
- Apr 19, 2010
- Apr 25, 2010
- Apr 27, 2010
- May 2, 2010
- May 4, 2010
- May 9, 2010
- May 16, 2010
- May 20, 2010
- May 21, 2010
- May 23, 2010
- May 30, 2010
- Jun 2, 2010
- Jun 6, 2010
- Jun 13, 2010
- Jun 20, 2010
- Jun 27, 2010
- Jul 4, 2010
- Jul 11, 2010
- Jul 12, 2010
- Jul 18, 2010
- Jul 23, 2010
- Jul 25, 2010
- Aug 1, 2010
- Aug 8, 2010
- Aug 14, 2010
- Aug 15, 2010
- Aug 22, 2010
- Aug 27, 2010
- Aug 29, 2010
- Aug 30, 2010
- Sep 2, 2010
- Sep 4, 2010
- Sep 5, 2010
- Sep 7, 2010
- Sep 9, 2010
- Sep 12, 2010
- Sep 16, 2010
- Sep 17, 2010
- Sep 18, 2010
- Sep 19, 2010
- Sep 20, 2010
- Sep 21, 2010
- Sep 22, 2010
- Sep 26, 2010
- Sep 29, 2010
- Oct 3, 2010
- Oct 5, 2010
- Oct 7, 2010
- Oct 10, 2010
- Oct 17, 2010
- Oct 24, 2010
- Oct 30, 2010
- Oct 31, 2010
- Nov 7, 2010
- Nov 10, 2010
- Nov 13, 2010
- Nov 14, 2010
- Nov 21, 2010
- Nov 23, 2010
- Nov 28, 2010
- Dec 5, 2010
- Dec 8, 2010
- Dec 9, 2010
- Dec 11, 2010
- Dec 12, 2010
- Dec 14, 2010
- Dec 19, 2010
- Dec 23, 2010
- Dec 24, 2010
- Dec 25, 2010
- Dec 26, 2010
- Dec 27, 2010
- Dec 28, 2010
- Dec 31, 2010
- Jan 2, 2011
- Jan 9, 2011
- Jan 16, 2011
- Jan 23, 2011
- Jan 29, 2011
- Jan 30, 2011
- Feb 6, 2011
- Feb 8, 2011
- Feb 13, 2011
- Feb 16, 2011
- Feb 18, 2011
- Feb 20, 2011
- Feb 24, 2011
- Feb 27, 2011
- Mar 6, 2011
- Mar 10, 2011
- Mar 13, 2011
- Mar 19, 2011
- Mar 20, 2011
- Mar 21, 2011
- Mar 26, 2011
- Mar 27, 2011
- Mar 29, 2011
- Mar 31, 2011
- Apr 3, 2011
- Apr 10, 2011
- Apr 11, 2011
- Apr 17, 2011
- Apr 24, 2011
- May 1, 2011
- May 3, 2011
- May 8, 2011
- May 11, 2011
- May 13, 2011
- May 15, 2011
- May 16, 2011
- May 20, 2011
- May 22, 2011
- May 26, 2011
- May 27, 2011
- May 29, 2011
- May 31, 2011
- Jun 5, 2011
- Jun 12, 2011
- Jun 19, 2011
- Jun 20, 2011
- Jun 23, 2011
- Jun 26, 2011
- Jul 3, 2011
- Jul 10, 2011
- Jul 17, 2011
- Jul 19, 2011
- Jul 24, 2011
- Jul 31, 2011
- Aug 4, 2011
- Aug 7, 2011
- Aug 9, 2011
- Aug 14, 2011
- Aug 15, 2011
- Aug 18, 2011
- Aug 21, 2011
- Aug 27, 2011
- Aug 28, 2011
- Sep 4, 2011
- Sep 9, 2011
- Sep 11, 2011
- Sep 14, 2011
- Sep 15, 2011
- Sep 16, 2011
- Sep 17, 2011
- Sep 18, 2011
- Sep 21, 2011
- Sep 25, 2011
- Oct 2, 2011
- Oct 7, 2011
- Oct 8, 2011
- Oct 9, 2011
- Oct 12, 2011
- Oct 13, 2011
- Oct 16, 2011
- Oct 17, 2011
- Oct 23, 2011
- Oct 25, 2011
- Oct 29, 2011
- Oct 30, 2011
- Nov 3, 2011
- Nov 6, 2011
- Nov 8, 2011
- Nov 9, 2011
- Nov 10, 2011
- Nov 12, 2011
- Nov 13, 2011
- Nov 17, 2011
- Nov 19, 2011
- Nov 20, 2011
- Nov 27, 2011
- Nov 28, 2011
- Nov 29, 2011
- Dec 2, 2011
- Dec 4, 2011
- Dec 5, 2011
- Dec 6, 2011
- Dec 7, 2011
- Dec 9, 2011
- Dec 10, 2011
- Dec 11, 2011
- Dec 15, 2011
- Dec 17, 2011
- Dec 18, 2011
- Dec 22, 2011
- Dec 30, 2011
- Dec 31, 2011
- Jan 1, 2012
- Jan 7, 2012
- Jan 8, 2012
- Jan 10, 2012
- Jan 11, 2012
- Jan 12, 2012
- Jan 14, 2012
- Jan 15, 2012
- Jan 16, 2012
- Jan 17, 2012
- Jan 18, 2012
- Jan 19, 2012
- Jan 20, 2012
- Jan 22, 2012
- Jan 23, 2012
- Jan 25, 2012
- Jan 28, 2012
- Jan 29, 2012
Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]
